They are trying hard to force this shit puppet on us
Guys this whole Syra thing is covered in Tulsi's newest, award winning book. Check out the cover:
The CFR gave her an award for it!
(my post is sarcastic)
SS: I thought Tulsi had moral convictions? So much for the only anti-war DNC candidate.
Expand More Comments
Gabbard is a phony. She would never dare defy the military industrial complex and geopolitical players in Washington like Trump just did.
Mock Trump all you want but that is brave and proof that they won't even give up a shred of territory without a fight.
Rofl at everyone who thinks there was EVER a viable political candidate. Like, really? This is the conspiracy forum, and you guys think someone running for political office is telling the truth? Give me a fucking break. Tulsi is just as bad as the next great political answer to all your problems. Stop paying attention and playing that stupid game, and you'll start getting real answers.
Anybody who doesn't realize that Trump abandoning the Kurds plays right into the hands of the military-industrial-complex isn't looking deep enough.
In her initial tweet she said "long enough to bring then home carefully"
Trump's withdrawal from Syria was not done carefully.
It was so poorly organized, US troops didn't even have time to dismantle a military base and clear out key intelligence resources....instead they beat a hasty retreat and bombed their own base
I see a meta tag.How can you blatantly ignore Tulsi's continued addition of quality in how these decisions should be executed?CarefullyNo clear mission/strategyPresent but achieving and striving for nothing
Would i be wrong in calling this post low hanging fruit or bait?
Gosh I was starting to like her now this lame shit
Rule 2 does not apply when replying to this stickied comment.
Rule 2 does apply throughout the rest of this thread.
What this means: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain only.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
"Everyone should have a shot at paid family leave" was an OP-ed written by pro-paid family leave activists Heather Boushey and Katie Bethell. "Trump's budget to include family leave" is a hard news story and doesn't contain an opinion at all. The final article, "How paid family leave hurts women," was another opinion piece authored by Vanessa Brown Calder, a policy analyst at the libertarian Cato Institute."
I understand we want to shit on CNN, but is it a bad thing that a new agency is offering multiple points of view?
I don't see the issue? What do op-eds and opinions have to do with anything? Should CNN not allow people with different opinions and perspectives to share them?
The last piece is from the Cato institute (libertarian) funded by the right-wing Koch bros.
trump is the enemy. msm is the enemy. clintons are the enemy. stop trying to muddy the waters you dumb fucks.
Y’all ever heard about OP-Ed’s?
Oh no, CNN publishing multiple viewpoints.
OP twisting headlines to fit their CNN bad narrative. Op-ed articles being compared.
I swear it’s every day someone is posting about how shit cnn is and defending fox in the comment sections. Every day. This isn’t the donald wtf? Why is it a conspiracy that cnn journalists can write opinion pieces?
Whatever happened to paid family leave anyway? Oh we gave that money go billionaires instead? Cool
If they show both sides, they are flip flopping. If they don’t, they’re censoring alternative perspectives. What are they supposed to do?
I see fair criticisms to this...meme...which highlight that two of the articles are opinion pieces by different people, one progressive and one libertarian.
But CNN is still curating, selecting what to put out there. I highly, highly doubt that their decision to post an anti paid leave article shortly after the Trump policy is mere coincidence. If it were coincidence, it would be just as likely for the order to be reversed. For example...paid leave bad; Trump doing paid leave; paid leave good.
For anyone following CNN the last few years it is obvious they are on a mission to exclusively promote negativity around The President. This is not some foil that theory. It is all day, every day. There is no Trump did X, why X is good opinion pattern. They are at war. It is not complicated.
The only instance I recall Trump getting positive coverage there was the day he bombed Syrian airfields.
You could do this with any outlet on any subject. Please don't shit up this sub with every image you got from /pol/.
Simple magicians trick, they know exactly what they are doing.
Holy shit! Everyone knows that no issue has more than one angle. It's either great for everyone or terrible for everyone. THERE EXISTS NO NUANCE.
“How paid leave hurts women” Lol wow just woooowwwww Back to work slaves!!
Well..... they get to say the first on came out on April 4, sooo....
if its the same author, it would def be shady (although devil's advocate, it could be a journalist trying to show the different angles of the issue) but I assume they are different authors.
It’s only really controversial if all those articles were written by the same person. Otherwise you are just showing us that CNN have a diversity of opinions working there.
Everyone in comments saying kudos to CNN for mentioning different viewpoints. I don't think CNN gives a shit about different viewpoints. I think what happened is CNN was sharing an opinion about something, Trump did something, now that they have nothing to be upset about, they slowly changed their opinion to something else that opposes what Trump did.
👆 Democratic paid online trolls out in full force in comments doing damage control 👇
This subs a shill factory.
Peak fake news. And there are millions of people out there who still think CNN is "fair and unbiased" XD
Classic Clinton network. 🎤
Democrat media is not used. Is propaganda designed to manipulate on educated Democrats Democra
You haven't figured out how op-ed pieces work? What are you, 13 years old?
LMAO this is actually hilarious.
Sorry about your ban
I'm seeing this "Epstein didn't kill himself" meme quite a bit. It could be this that pulls Epstein away from the memory hole he's so close to falling into. What we need now is someone to insert it into front page r/all or a live broadcast somehow.
You're fighting the good fight.
This is the second one of these I've seen. I love them.
Maybe because it's a meme and not interesting?
I personally find it amusing, but it doesn't fit that subreddit.
I think that not caring that you'd get banned is fine, or even not knowing the subreddit rules is also fine. But if you knowingly posts content that isn't appropriate for a subreddit or knowlingly causes trouble with people on that subreddit(including moderators), then I feel like you've crossed a line into selfish and/or harmful behavior.
I am not trying to accuse you of anything or judge you as a person. Just explaining why some people might be confrontational towards this.
..........idk ..... they're gonna say you broke rules 2,4 and 6.
But I put out bait just to check.
I'd bank on that last ghost not even being dead if I had the money to do it.
Interestingaf is a shit repost farm anyways. You are better off
Would it be a bad idea to post "... and Epstein didn't kill himself." in every TIL thread?
Whitey Bulger had a better cover story. /s
That is not conspiracy that is truth
This isnt a conspiracy related post, but here it is at the top of the page anyways.
Not to attack you OP, but it is shameful what this sub has turned into since the last election. Maybe 30% of new posts I see have anything to do with actual conspiracy theory. Its completely turned into a battleground for TD and Politics.
Everyone is acting as if this means the mods for this sub are ducking controlled by the government but IN Reality it’s because op posted something that didn’t fit the sub lol
I think it's best (this is just my opinion) if we definitely don't try to figure out why the fourth ghost acts so differently...
that's because you intentionally posted something in the wrong subreddit lmao
I thought it was interesting as fuck...
Normies gonna norm
I got banned from /r/EntExchange for sarcastically calling something "Ghey" ..MODs be tripping sometimes. 🤷♂️
They actually each try to position themselves to one of the 4 sides.....
But yea the second part is accurate
What do you expect, Reddit is a Liberal shithole, all they do is silence people.
This is clearly r\madlads material...lol
I think this maybe is going to lead in a situation, where 9/11 is now. It is thought as a joke if you say "9/11 is an inside job" in a rogue manner like this one. Maybe "Epstein didn't kill himself" is going to be the same. Im not sure if that would be a good thing... maybe it only makes the real issue hidden behind a joke.
No wonder - you said blue but that ghost is clearly GREEN!
Worth a remove, but not a ban
me as soon as I see this
Wear your dissidence with pride!
Oh that’s rich. Well done.
Hahaha this is great LMAO
Because it's like saying the victims of the Sandy Hook hoax didn't actually die because they were fake, which they didn't and they were. I'm just saying. Objective opposition to their official narratives must be silenced.
Classic action of The Age of Controlled Information!
Thank you for getting banned for fighting the real causes. Julian Assange WHO
This is retarded and childish. Can't blame them.
I mean it's not that interesting
reddit is a fucking joke everyone on this worthless website cries and downvotes to anything that disagrees with them even if it's articulately explained. Sad to see.
ss: I just got banned from r/interestingasfuck for posting this. I get it but I mostly think it's funny
I thought I was on T_D for a second with this post.
Not really a big conspiracy. You can see contradictory opinion articles by the same authors all the time. It's just news media junk food to pander to their base. Right and left do it all the damn time.
That evil bitch needs to go away and surrender to whatever illness she has
Shillin 4 Tha Duckets
Mhm looks like the liberal owned media is at work!
Have a look at south Africa. We have a massive crisis (50+ % unemployment, corrupt ineffective government and police, daily violent protests/looting State owed entities collapsing, daily calls for genocide of minorities by politicians, massive crime problem [rape capital of the world, higher murder rate than low level civil war], racist policies against minorities, one of the highest road fatalities in the world, aids capital of the world, open borders with 20+ million illegal aliens. It goes on and on.
I personally know 10 people who have been murdered.
3 people who died in car accidents
Everyone I know (not exaggerating) has been high jacked (and some kidnapped), most have had violent home invasions (with raping 80 year old grannies, mothers and babies), torture, etc.
I just got home from visiting my sister and her Chilean husband, and we had a long conversation about the events happening there. He's a naturalized US citizen and has been here for 20 years, but still has a lot of family there.
He unequivocally said that the media's portrayal of all of it happening because of a fare increase is bullshit, and that was only "the match" that detonated long simmering tensions there.
He told me that what people are really upset about, and have been for a long time is the absolute elitism and corruption that has plagued that country. There is as you mentioned a massive divide in the living conditions between the ruling class and the rest of ther country.
He said that the ruling class there has their own schools, transportation, and infrastructure that are only afforded to those at the top, while the normies continue to struggle to make ends meet.
Once again, the media in this country have muddied the waters and concealed the actual truth about why people are rioting on the streets there, dismissing it as a petty complaint about fare increases.
Although media outlets have made the protests only about an increase in public transport, the fact is there has been a lot that the Chilean people have to be angry about.
They are being pillaged by their leaders. The corruption runs deep and affects every facet of their lives. Shit, even water is privatized.
It is good to see el pueblo stand up for itself.
I'm beginning to notice a pattern globally. Hmmmm? s/
People should see a film, Missing with Jack Lemmon and Sissy Spacek.
Yah, its just a film...
Political elite only make 33x more than minimum wage? They need some USA lessons.
I want to hear more about this toilet paper cartel...
I find it ironic that this is exactly what happened in Brazil in 2015. A lot of sh*t was happening for years, but only when the cost of public transportation was raised that people started protesting, which ultimately led to the impeachment of Dilma Rousseff and the "rightfication" of the country.
The giant woke up only to destroy what was left of the country.
Chilean bros, be careful with who you side with, the friend of today can become a foe in the future.
At least the part about "worst education in South America" is bullshit, according to the PISA Ranking - http://factsmaps.com/pisa-worldwide-ranking-average-score-of-math-science-reading/
The only country in the world where water is private.
Forgive me for ignorance, but I don’t understand that statement. Everywhere has a private sector for water and most countries have corporatist state companies running water for a fee, it’s not a public utility.
true, freaking everything.
Hey, it's usually a great source of upvotes to bash on Sweden on this sub, so I'd just like to take this moment to point out that we're having the same issues as Chile just on a slightly smaller scale.
For example, our school system is funded roughly the same way, basically how Betsy DeVos wants the US schools to be funded, public funding with private profits and "free choice". We did the change well after they did and well after the effects of such a system was perfectly obvious to anyone who gave a shit, and our costs have risen and results have fallen nonstop since.
Just another piece of the Neoliberal puzzle that cannot be undone without revolution. It just gets blamed on immigrants, taxes and "not enough", just as the rest of the puzzle whenever they're discussed individually.
Lol absolute nonsense
Elite salaries only 33x minimum? That’s downright reasonable compared to the inequality shit show in the US. Try CEO pay 300x the average worker.
Why is this allowed to happen? Independent of the veracity of the claim that Western civilization has "appropriated" a concept as universal as mathematics, what does this even have to do with the study of the subject? It's not a "math history" class...
Is this some Ancient Egyptian kangz shit, where the Arabs who created algebra are now going to be retconned as "people of color" whose creation was stolen by the white man?
SS: Further proof the elite are using our school systems to indoctrinate our children. They are teaching them to hate their culture so they are ok with it being replaced. When are people going to stand up to this?
Do English next
That is no communism. Did you drop out of school in the 4th grade?
If it takes 100 slaves 6 months to build a 40 room plantation house, how long will it take with
b) no food?
How many will still be alive at the end of construction?
To be fair, this is Seattle. As ridiculous as this is, I'll be more concerned if it somehow spreads to less outrageously liberal areas.
Indoctrination? Please. The people in this sub who argue for teaching “alternative histories” always flip out when they’re actually confronted with it.
A lot of concepts were invented by non-western people but it is generally assumed as they weren’t. Though, I doubt any kid actually stopped to consider where those theorems come from.
If you think this is "communist" you better get back to school. Oh, wait, they don't teach you anything about Communism in school. Must be the Fox News you have been watching, better stop it before your brain rots.
But yeah, this is stupid as fuck. I'ld love to hear their warped rational for calling math "appropriated by Western culture". Maybe someone heard that we are using Arabic numerals and blew a fuse.
Remember the woman who called a man on a plane a terrorist because he was doing math?
You know what? I, as just your average, normal everyday guy, have often thought that schools should infuse all K-12 math classes with ethnic-studies questions that encourage students to explore how math has been appropriated by Western culture and used in systems of power and oppression. Nice to see they’re finally doing something about this important issue
"communist indoctrination"? lol...ok
What’s The Harm?
Blatantly obvious attempt to dumb schools down even more
The Original head of the Sphinx was much larger. Most likely it was either that the head of a Lion or a Jackal, archaeologist say. You can tell this head here is a relatively a new carving compared to the rest of the structure based on weathering patterns and that this new head was added latter when only a portion of the sphinx was seen poking out from the sand.
I don't know how we could say which size they would have wanted.
SS: Many say the head of the Great Sphinx is too small for its body.
With no absolute proof either way if it's original or recarved, let's see if those perceptions are correct.
The great pyramids and sphynx were built long before the Egyptians found them, built by the civilization preceding the deluge over 10k years ago. Look at a the other pyramids in egypt other than the great pyramids. Notice the huge gap in build quality and size? Notice how they don't compare whatsoever to the great 3?
I think this is similar to how the Sphinx's head looked before remodelling. Edit: I cannot link a pic for the life of me--But I think the Sphinx had a jackal head like Anubis.
Yea schoch is. Doc on Netflix too. Don’t sweat it, you can’t know everything ya know?
Don’t have an answer to your question plus it’s a pointless one. Only matters that it’s been replaced over lengthy periods of time.
Dude you’re being obscene if you’re truly just looking for an answer. Just go look up one of the million documentaries or excavation papers and see who the archeologist was working with him on any number of the projects.
The field you’re looking into involves duplicitous titles on these digs including anthropology, geologists, Egyptologist, etc.
Anyone else notice how many vaccine memes make it to the front page every week?
Freedom of association would also allow parents of vaccinated children to segregate them.
(Copy/Paste from this link. I'm not OP)
As a parent who thought vaccines were awesome, I would like to share with you some assumptions I had before I had kids. Assumptions I had when I happily brought my own kid in for shots. Assumptions I did not bother to question until my own kid had a neurological injury.
I assumed that vaccines were the most tested thing ever for safety. I assumed that the vaccines on the CDC schedule were in the combinations they were in, because they somehow experimented and figured out what combinations would be safe at one time. This is not the case. http://www.jpands.org/vol21no2/miller.pdf
I assumed that they studied vaccines for the cumulative effects of the entire CDC schedule. This is not the case. According to this Institute of Medicine report, "studies designed to examine the long-term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule have not been conducted". http://nationalacademies.org/HMD/Reports/2013/The-Childhood-Immunization-Schedule-and-Safety.aspx
I assumed that during the FDA safety trials, that vaccines were tested against a real placebo, like drugs are. This is not the case. Rather, they are tested against another vaccine. When both groups have about the same amount of reactions, the new vaccine is deemed "safe". At 1:07:00, they explain how the Hep B shot (for example) was tested. https://youtu.be/v9bVeEwyxXk
I assumed that vaccines did not cause autism and the science was settled. I assumed that they had compared kids who got vaccines to kids who didn't get vaccines, and neither group had a different amount of autism. That's how you would do the study right? Well they don't do that. They have never done a vaxxed vs fully unvaxxed study. From #2's IOM report https://imgur.com/a/rUzNQEn and from the CDC itself https://imgur.com/3tH4GeG. So how do they come up with this "settled science" on autism? Epidemiological studies, which are easily manipulated, or studies where they look at people who have had LESS vaccines. So for example, they'll do a study and find that kids who got the MMR had the same rate of autism as kids who (got all the other shots but) didn't get the MMR. Here's the problem with that: Healthy user bias. The MMR isn't until 12 months, so if you give your kid the earlier vaccines, they suffer a neurological injury, and you stop vaccinating or slow down, you will be put in the "less vaccinated" category...and that's not a real control group; that's a concentrated-injury group. Here's a diagram that explains it better. https://imgur.com/zczKctf
Here's where we get more anecdotal. I assumed that the medical community was aware of vaccine injury if it were to happen. They're not. I had NO IDEA how in-denial pediatricians are. They don't know points 1-4 that I explained so far. They go by what the CDC says. Their livelihood depends on giving vaccines and they want to do what's right, they want to believe they're helping children. So reading anything against the narrative is too much cognitive dissonance for them. This leads me to number 6...
I assumed that doctors would want to know the cause of the kid's problems. Like on TV, those doctors really investigate! Kid came down with epilepsy? Okay let's get STAT imaging, blood tests, genetic tests, let's check the house for mold, let's look into environmental factors... So imagine my surprise when my kid is having multiple seizures and "uhh I don't know the cause but I can tell you it wasn't the vaccines". They ran a few basic tests but I had to push for everything. You'll be referred to a neurologist, who will prescribe medications and luckily they will work. Nothing wrong with that. But what surprised me is how they absolutely do not care about the cause (if it's not something glaringly obvious like a tumor.) As long as the meds are working, who cares?
I assumed that doctors would grant medical vaccine exemptions to people who have been injured by vaccines. They don't. In order to get an exemption, that would require admitting that vaccine injury exists, and the cause of your problems doesn't matter, remember? An example: Adult has to get a flu shot for work. Immediately feels like crap and within a few days has numbness to extremities. Doctors all have the same line, "Idk what this is, but I don't think flu shots cause it". Prescribe stuff like gabapentin and lyrica, go home. Does this person get a doctor's note to excuse him from future flu shots at work? No. Does this person get informed that he may be entitled to compensation through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Act? No. Does this person's issue even get reported to VAERS (vaccine adverse event reporting system)? No.
Speaking of VAERS, I assumed doctors knew about it and used it. So imagine my surprise when after all the tests I pushed for came back negative, and the doctor quietly verbally admitted that it very well could have been an "extremely rare" reaction to the shots...Okay cool so you're gonna report it to VAERS right? Nope. They typically don't want to do it. Reporting to VAERS is a tedious process. VAERS is extremely under-reported. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK232983/.
I assumed that the CDC, or FDA, SOMEBODY followed up on these injuries. They don't. A common criticism of VAERS reports is that they're not "confirmed". Well who is supposed to confirm them? Do you really think the government is going to come to your house and examine your kid and magically know whether the shots caused their autism? Speaking of government agencies...
I assumed that the pharmaceutical companies had some oversight. Did you know that the US Department of Health and Human Services is supposed to do audits every two years? When the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was established in 1986, vaccine manufacturers became immune from all liability. (Yes, you read that right.) In exchange for not being allowed to be sued, the HHS was supposed to do bi-annual audits. Guess how many they've done in 30 years? ZERO. In fact, a group identified this and sent a letter to the HHS about it. long PDF download
Most of all I think I just assumed that everyone knew MORE than they do. I thought there was some interesting scientific reason for the vaccine combos, that the CDC schedule would be tailored to my child's unique health issues if needed. Like, maybe certain kids shouldn't have certain vaccines, but others are okay? I thought my doctor would know that. If something bad happened, surely the doctors would know what was going on and change my child's vaccine schedule right? And surely if vaccines caused problems, they would know because they're the most studied thing ever.
Until you have a kid and deal with a vaccine injury, it's hard to comprehend just how crazy this rabbithole is. Stay safe guys. Edit- format
Here's my thoughts on vaccination and freedom of choice in general.
As long as your choice doesn't negatively impact someone else's life or their ability to make their own choices, we should all be free to do as we please.
However, by choosing to not vaccinate your child, you are leaving them exposed to potentially contact whatever disease is being vaccinated for. Additionally you are risking exposure to other people via communication from the unvaccinated child.
Freedom of choice for the whole > freedom of choice for the individual.
This is incorrect. The fundamental question is: should society be able to make decisions for benefit for the whole even if those decisions harm a few?
Funny how Rockland county is the healthiest county in New York when they have the lowest amount of vaccines in New York.
Funny how japan is the healthiest country in the world when they don't get vaccinated as much.
Why can't they just be transparent and 3rd party tested?
I'm vaccinated willingly. I do not want to be vaccinated unwillingly.
Edit: I also do not capture rainwater. I do not want to be forced to not be able to capture rainwater.
It's my hot body! I'll do what I want!
Aight but we know what's in them and that it's good for us. The difference is that this isn't a mystery fluid that makes us healthy but actually injects nanobots that brainwash you, it's just medicine.
That's not the vaccine debate at all. The "debate" is whether its harmful or not.
The government doesn't possess the control to inject you with a vaccine against your will. That's why unvaccinated people and kids exist in the first place. If the government had that power, the "debate" wouldn't even exist at all.
I agree, the way people come after Kat Von D
Y’all still getting vaccinated? Jokers
I think vaccines are good for the most part but I never think a government should have the power to forcibly vaccinate people. Who knows what else is going in the vaccines that they keep us blissfully ignorant of. Plus there's the fact that they have been used for the purpose of eugenics.
I knew this sub had the antivaxers I was naive to give you all the benefit of the doubt.
I have vaccine, vaccination, vaxx, and every other special spelling of the word on my filter list. Best thing I've ever done to make reddit more enjoyable.
This and chemtrails are some of the biggest, in your face conspiracies that if you critically think about it and do research, are clearly not what they seem, that get the most flack from the sheep.
A lot of these vaccines have mercury in them... full stop that should be enough to give people pause... but no.
I remember when I was a child, my parents and teachers would tell me that the mercury in the thermometers were dangerous so dont touch it and if it ever broke, dont touch it.
But yeah, completely fine to inject because with the other chemicals, its medicine.
SS: As you can tell from my account history, I love debating about this. I could go on and on about the safety and efficacy, or lack thereof. But with the upcoming legislation in various states, everybody should be fighting for medical freedom.
ITT: Provaxxers who don't know shit about what's been going on in California and New York.
Not that simple when you are putting others at risk.
That sounds good on the surface, but is weak as the counter argument would be a public health risk.
It's idiots like these whose kids are causing measles and mumps outbreaks.
Whether or not you agree with the argument, this blatantly ignores it. The argument is parents who choose to not get their kids vaccinated are a danger to kids who can't get vaccinated.
Yeah and the earth is flat lol
Wow... an actual logical argument from the anti-vax side! Absolutely blown away!
my body my choice... I like the ring of that.
Weird definitely different
Are there any photos of what his signature looked like before that pic (left picture)
Here come all the highly trained handwriting analysts.....
Based on law, if hes on his deathbed and someone is getting him to sign papers that paper is not valid. If hes on his deathbed hes under the influence of drugs. Those documents are definitely forged then.
There are years between those two signatures
They are surely different.
But some people do really suck at their own signature.
Why would they NEED to have his signature at this time? Couldn't someone else just sign it? Whoever takes on his duties while in hospital?
It looks like S oros' hand writing. Sarcasm alert.
If he was having medical issues it might have effected his writing.
Check out new.. About to post something more about your topic. Seems someone admitted to it on Twitter
I have seriously lost respect for this sub. Instead of focusing on actual conspiracies; that people in our gov't is using a foreign power for political gain, Trump hosting the G-7 at his golf course, money laundering through Trumps hotels, tax evasion, & most of all Russia, could be destroying our country from the inside.... and you focus on this bullshit? This is the conspiracy? Trying to get information is the conspiracy? Really? I thought this sub would welcome more information rather than a coverup.
Trump is involved in major corruption and all this sub can do is spew shit about the Dems or the Clintons. Trump is selling out our country for his own gain, he doesn't give a shit about you, yet you stand behind him. smh
If you were dying, would your signature be exactly the same as if you were healthy? Because to me I think they would be different
The signature on The subpoena of Giuliani doesn't match Elijah Cummings signature. The question is who signed it??
Here’s the thing:
No one gives a shit if he is prosecuted. Do it! Get ALL OF THE PEDOS OFF THE STREETS, AND OUT OF THE BOARDROOMS. Get them off their yachts and computers and sick little depraved holes they came from and put their nasty asses in jail. This shouldn’t be a partisan issue, DONT MAKE IT ONE.
Other thread not popular enough?
What you and many others seem to still not understand. The majority of people on the left would be all in favor of prosecuting Clinton If he’s a pedophile just as much as Trump. Now ask yourself or any of the other dozen hardcore bootlickers around here if you feel the same way about your God Emperor.
The Democrat trolls are desperate to keep that scandal under wraps. They don't want you to know about it
Your really bad guy is the same as my distasteful guy, so stop worrying! It's the opposite of divide and conquer, ally and disarm. All brought to you by Hillary Clinton's 2020 campaign.
"I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy! It's been said he enjoys beautiful women as much as I do, some of them on the younger side."
The younger side...the younger side...Terrific guy! Terrific guy!
Donald Trump, 2002.
Made with Love in New York City, New Jersey & Monterrey, Mexico.