They had us in the first half, not gonna lie.
“heterophobia isn’t real”
also wants to forget hetero people exist
I was smiling for the first half, and then it instantly vanished in the second part.
So our Author is so heterophobic that people attacking heterosexual people triggers them.
And our Author denies that heterophobia exists.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the first step in dealing with a problem admitting that you HAVE that problem?
In which case our Author may need professional help.
It's 2019...how do people not know it's "anyway" not "anyways".
forget hetero people exsisting im amazed other people exsist!.
Well, you forgot the shift key exists. So you've got that going for you, I guess.
This is seriously the most blatant bait come on
Hypocrite
As someone who was adopted this makes me so ridiculously infuriated. No one is making these people give up kids, unless we’re talking about human trafficking. This person is so sheltered that they can even imagine how shitty of a situation it has to be that kids, for one reason or another, are given to orphanages. I would rather live with a family than grow up in poverty and neglect just to experience some “culture” ffs.
Also racism exists in non-white countries too but that’s another issue to rage about at a different time.
Better to let them starve to death? Leave them to die of exposure?
Good to see our disgusting cunt of an author has their priorities out on display for all the world to see.
A shame that twitter can't be bothered kicking those who would rather see a child die than adopted by a white couple from their site.
alright should we start sending them back? we can start by sending you back to Africa author even if your white. we don't want you here anymore anyways so lets go get you culturally enriched!.
Much better to let them starve to death alongside people who can't feed them, but use the same make-up range.
Then be a saint and you adopt them then.
Their right to starve on a pavement?
Yeah...it's so much better to have these kids sick, uneducated, abused, raped and dead. Damn those white demons for taking them away from all these great experiences. I wonder how people can be so stupid and say stuff like this. There are kids that barely have anything to eat, clean water, clothes and toys and idiots that clearly know nothing about these kind of hardships talk about how it's better if the kids remained in those conditions.
Yeah we should leave thr starving African kids in Africa where they can die meaningless deaths before ever getting to live.
Hey OP, your desire for ethnostates is showing. It kinda proves that "white" cultures (Western liberal democracies) are actually some of the least racist cultures that have ever existed. That a family would look beyond their own household and see a child from another race and culture in need and willingly raise and love the child in question seems pretty antic racist to me.
Unironically based and redpilled. Rich whites adopt poor third worlders to serve as a living, breathing virtue signalling token.
As someone who was adopted this makes me so ridiculously infuriated. No one is making these people give up kids, unless we’re talking about human trafficking. This person is so sheltered that they can even imagine how shitty of a situation it has to be that kids, for one reason or another, are given to orphanages. I would rather live with a family than grow up in poverty and neglect just to experience some “culture” ffs.
Also racism exists in non-white countries too but that’s another issue to rage about at a different time.
Better to let them starve to death? Leave them to die of exposure?
Good to see our disgusting cunt of an author has their priorities out on display for all the world to see.
A shame that twitter can't be bothered kicking those who would rather see a child die than adopted by a white couple from their site.
alright should we start sending them back? we can start by sending you back to Africa author even if your white. we don't want you here anymore anyways so lets go get you culturally enriched!.
Is the Korean system racist for having lots of Korean orphans adopted in the west?
Or is it the fact that Korean culture makes Korean families feel like raising someone else's child is a failure?
Much better to let them starve to death alongside people who can't feed them, but use the same make-up range.
Then be a saint and you adopt them then.
Their right to starve on a pavement?
Yeah...it's so much better to have these kids sick, uneducated, abused, raped and dead. Damn those white demons for taking them away from all these great experiences. I wonder how people can be so stupid and say stuff like this. There are kids that barely have anything to eat, clean water, clothes and toys and idiots that clearly know nothing about these kind of hardships talk about how it's better if the kids remained in those conditions.
Yeah we should leave thr starving African kids in Africa where they can die meaningless deaths before ever getting to live.
Hey OP, your desire for ethnostates is showing. It kinda proves that "white" cultures (Western liberal democracies) are actually some of the least racist cultures that have ever existed. That a family would look beyond their own household and see a child from another race and culture in need and willingly raise and love the child in question seems pretty antic racist to me.
Unironically based and redpilled. Rich whites adopt poor third worlders to serve as a living, breathing virtue signalling token.
It is in a sense a slur, but not always a racial one. But this idea is far from revolutionary in fiction. A lot of times when I see these type of slurs it often refers to being dirty or being from some lowly place rather than race.
Having never seen an episode of the show, and especially given the liberal nature of this show anyway - this just sounds like innocent fan theory to me.
I don't think that their saying anything bad here. It's an interesting idea and their not saying it's a metaphor for ths n word
This is clearly not serious.
A concept of race is non-existence in the gem society though. Maybe it’s just a regular insult.
clod
I'm getting Slashdot flashbacks
RACIAL. FUCKING, RACIAL.
Wow, you guys are searching the bottom of the barrel, aren't you?
this is just someone making a joke anyways
I think “off color” is more a “racial slur” then clod. Clod would just be idiot or something.
In regards to Steven Universe.
That is where I stopped reading.
It is in a sense a slur, but not always a racial one. But this idea is far from revolutionary in fiction. A lot of times when I see these type of slurs it often refers to being dirty or being from some lowly place rather than race.
Having never seen an episode of the show, and especially given the liberal nature of this show anyway - this just sounds like innocent fan theory to me.
I don't think that their saying anything bad here. It's an interesting idea and their not saying it's a metaphor for ths n word
"Clod" "Lump of dirt" Do the minds of these people just constantly look for bullshit to call racist?
This is clearly not serious.
A concept of race is non-existence in the gem society though. Maybe it’s just a regular insult.
clod
I'm getting Slashdot flashbacks
RACIAL. FUCKING, RACIAL.
Wow, you guys are searching the bottom of the barrel, aren't you?
this is just someone making a joke anyways
I think “off color” is more a “racial slur” then clod. Clod would just be idiot or something.
In regards to Steven Universe.
That is where I stopped reading.
Right.
Because this is an Aussie, I'll use an Aussie example. The 'journalist' should be familiar with it given that ABC presented very biased reporting on the subject for quite some time. This particular example is very apt, but it's long so there's a TLDR at the bottom.
In May of 2013 an Aboriginal woman by the name of Cindy Prior employed at the Queensland University of Technology (QUT), ejected three students from a computer lab which was reserved for indigenous students. Unfortunately the lab wasn't marked as reserved for indigenous students.
This prompted one of the students to comment, on facebook,
Just got kicked out of the unsigned indigenous computer room. QUT stopping segregation with segregation.
Other comments were made, some of which were unpleasant at the least, but none of those comments were made by the three students.
Prior was apparently so distressed by this that she was unable to work for 12 months. I'm not shitting you ... Prior claimed to have PTSD as a result of this.1
In May of 2014 Prior lodged a complaint against seven 'entities' (the 3 students, 3 University staff, and QUT itself) with the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC). This is where it gets really messy. The AHRC sat on the complaint and did not inform the students at the request of Prior and QUT.
In May of 2015 (so now two years after the event took place and a year after the complaint was made) the AHRC scheduled a conciliation conference for the 3rd of August 2015. The students were not informed. In June (a month after scheduling the conference) the AHRC asked QUT to inform the students of the conference. On 28 July 2015 QUT asked the AHRC to delay the conference but the AHRC responded that it had had enough time to contact the students.
Unfortunately the AHRC were wrong ... Gillian Triggs, the President of the AHRC (and the woman responsible for the mishandling of this entire incident) later had to acknowledge that several of the students had not been informed.
Those students who were actually informed had less than a month to come to terms with the fact that they were being accused of hate speech and to prepare to deal with the accusation, as QUT took their time telling them anything.
On 25 August 2015, the AHRC terminated the complaint but Prior pursued the case in the federal court suing the three students. Apparently all the others named settled out of court.
In November of 2016 Prior's case was struck down before going to trial.
Tony Morris (QC) who represented one of the students said, of Prior, "Who can blame her for acting on the encouragement that she gets from the Human Rights Commission?"
During the time that this case was in the public eye, the three students were repeatedly slandered with accusations of racism and bigotry. In one case the slander was uttered by a Federal Member of Parliament Terri Butler on the ABC who was then sued by one of the students for defamation.
In December of 2016 Butler settled the case (costs and an unstated financial payout), and issued a real apology instead of the half-arsed one she had tried to get away with previously.
TLDR;
We have an example of someone using the the 'anti hate speech' laws in a fashion which is clearly self-serving. (They get their case kicked out of court)
We have an example of what happens to innocent parties when they are dragged into the bullshit bureaucracy surrounding those laws. (Three students were fucked over by the Australian Human Rights Commission)
And we have an example of what happens when someone really DOES abuse free speech and gets dragged to court over it. (A federal MP was sued for defamation and settled financially and issued a real apology.)
So what exactly is our 'journalist' demanding? More restrictions on speech that she doesn't approve of.
Fuck that.
As an aside ... most of the information in this was lifted from this article.
1
As to Prior's claims of PTSD, they were not backed up by medical examination which was presented in court prior to it going to trial.
It's behind a paywall, but this is lifted from an article by The Australian:
Comprehensive medical reports question the severity and reasons for a stress disorder affecting an indigenous university staffer who is seeking $250,000 damages from students in a section 18C racial hatred case.
The medical reports, introduced to the controversial case as formal public exhibits by the Queensland University of Technology employee and her Brisbane solicitor Susan Moriarty suggest Cindy Prior carries past grievances and overreacted to students’ Facebook posts.
Simone Shaw, a psychologist who conducted a long interview and examination, said in a 13-page report that Ms Prior was “unlikely to attribute personal responsibility to events that occur in her life”.
“As a result of this personality style, she is likely to blame and begrudge others when she perceives she has been mistreated, which appears evident in relation to the incident on 28 May, 2013,’’ Dr Shaw reported.
“She may be blindly uncritical of her own behaviour and insensitive to negative consequences associated with her behaviour, tending to minimise the negative impact that her behaviour has on others and on herself.
Dr Shaw said Ms Prior appeared to have had numerous workplace occurrences that she had perceived as bullying, harassment and racial vilification.
“It appears that these experiences continue to cause distress to Ms Prior in relation to her perceptions of justice,” she said.
It's amazing - and worrying - how many Regressives seem to struggle with the idea that anyone could not base their morals on identity politics.
what do we define as hate speech? personally i just tend to ignore the negativity i get from people even if they are throwing hate filled words at me. i can live without the pieces of shit in society the ones just looking to actually hurt people not just hurt feelings but the kinds of people who will go out of their way to act on their words. as for the people who just hurl hurtful insults and shit i just cant be assed with them. most of the time its usually the person angrily insulting you who has the problem i mean if they didn't have the problem they wouldn't just threaten and harass a person right? that's just me though i hear insults constantly in my line of work iv just learned to not put to much weight behind peoples words.
Why does the 35-39 age range have anything to do with it?
LGBTQI, immigrants
So let me guess... if you were to voice displeasure with men exposing themselves to little girls in the locker room, or with the violent roaming gangs formed by immigrant men, this woman would demand you be sent prison?
But free speech activists don't want to be free of consequences. They want to be allowed to say controversial things without being arrested.
Oh dear
Why would you be afraid of letting people show you who they are? You may not like what they say, but I'd rather be able to identify the crazies than not. Let them dig their own graves.
"freedom to say what you want without consequence". That's not how it works sweetie. You have the right to say what you want, and the responsinility to face the consequences thereof.
Are people really that stupid that they think "free speech" means "consequence free platform"?
I feel like this person doesn’t understand how freedom of speech works.
I can say offensive things until I’m blue in the face. I cannot incite violence, endanger the public safety, or make false statements about someone for personal gain.
I think that the qualifier for “hate speech” should be limited to making credible threats against certain groups. I also think that hate speech should be blind to race, creed, or sexuality. Anyone who singles out a group of people with the distinct motivation of advocating violence against that target group, has used hate speech to commit an assault. However, I think it is a slippery slope to try and codify it as law. I’d rather live in a world where we express ourselves freely (and suffer the proverbial slings and arrows) and have the occasional Nazi to deal with, rather than a society that has thoughtcrime.
As an Asian man, what she doesn't realize is that I don't give a shit what angry white supremacists say and that I care even less about what liberal "journalists" like her dribble out of their cum swallowers
So that means that content will be censored
They added an I now? What's that stand for?
I have a scoop
For someone that makes a living on the written word she sure as hell has no idea what freedom of speech actually is.
Woman.
Not surprised, let's face it, the only way their trainwreck of an ideology survives is if no one is allowed to point out its flaws.
Australians love the ABC, I don't fucking get it.
Right.
Because this is an Aussie, I'll use an Aussie example. The 'journalist' should be familiar with it given that ABC presented very biased reporting on the subject for quite some time. This particular example is very apt, but it's long so there's a TLDR at the bottom.
In May of 2013 an Aboriginal woman by the name of Cindy Prior employed at the Queensland University of Technology (QUT), ejected three students from a computer lab which was reserved for indigenous students. Unfortunately the lab wasn't marked as reserved for indigenous students.
This prompted one of the students to comment, on facebook,
Just got kicked out of the unsigned indigenous computer room. QUT stopping segregation with segregation.
Other comments were made, some of which were unpleasant at the least, but none of those comments were made by the three students.
Prior was apparently so distressed by this that she was unable to work for 12 months. I'm not shitting you ... Prior claimed to have PTSD as a result of this.1
In May of 2014 Prior lodged a complaint against seven 'entities' (the 3 students, 3 University staff, and QUT itself) with the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC). This is where it gets really messy. The AHRC sat on the complaint and did not inform the students at the request of Prior and QUT.
In May of 2015 (so now two years after the event took place and a year after the complaint was made) the AHRC scheduled a conciliation conference for the 3rd of August 2015. The students were not informed. In June (a month after scheduling the conference) the AHRC asked QUT to inform the students of the conference. On 28 July 2015 QUT asked the AHRC to delay the conference but the AHRC responded that it had had enough time to contact the students.
Unfortunately the AHRC were wrong ... Gillian Triggs, the President of the AHRC (and the woman responsible for the mishandling of this entire incident) later had to acknowledge that several of the students had not been informed.
Those students who were actually informed had less than a month to come to terms with the fact that they were being accused of hate speech and to prepare to deal with the accusation, as QUT took their time telling them anything.
On 25 August 2015, the AHRC terminated the complaint but Prior pursued the case in the federal court suing the three students. Apparently all the others named settled out of court.
In November of 2016 Prior's case was struck down before going to trial.
Tony Morris (QC) who represented one of the students said, of Prior, "Who can blame her for acting on the encouragement that she gets from the Human Rights Commission?"
During the time that this case was in the public eye, the three students were repeatedly slandered with accusations of racism and bigotry. In one case the slander was uttered by a Federal Member of Parliament Terri Butler on the ABC who was then sued by one of the students for defamation.
In December of 2016 Butler settled the case (costs and an unstated financial payout), and issued a real apology instead of the half-arsed one she had tried to get away with previously.
TLDR;
We have an example of someone using the the 'anti hate speech' laws in a fashion which is clearly self-serving. (They get their case kicked out of court)
We have an example of what happens to innocent parties when they are dragged into the bullshit bureaucracy surrounding those laws. (Three students were fucked over by the Australian Human Rights Commission)
And we have an example of what happens when someone really DOES abuse free speech and gets dragged to court over it. (A federal MP was sued for defamation and settled financially and issued a real apology.)
So what exactly is our 'journalist' demanding? More restrictions on speech that she doesn't approve of.
Fuck that.
As an aside ... most of the information in this was lifted from this article.
1
As to Prior's claims of PTSD, they were not backed up by medical examination which was presented in court prior to it going to trial.
It's behind a paywall, but this is lifted from an article by The Australian:
Comprehensive medical reports question the severity and reasons for a stress disorder affecting an indigenous university staffer who is seeking $250,000 damages from students in a section 18C racial hatred case.
The medical reports, introduced to the controversial case as formal public exhibits by the Queensland University of Technology employee and her Brisbane solicitor Susan Moriarty suggest Cindy Prior carries past grievances and overreacted to students’ Facebook posts.
Simone Shaw, a psychologist who conducted a long interview and examination, said in a 13-page report that Ms Prior was “unlikely to attribute personal responsibility to events that occur in her life”.
“As a result of this personality style, she is likely to blame and begrudge others when she perceives she has been mistreated, which appears evident in relation to the incident on 28 May, 2013,’’ Dr Shaw reported.
“She may be blindly uncritical of her own behaviour and insensitive to negative consequences associated with her behaviour, tending to minimise the negative impact that her behaviour has on others and on herself.
Dr Shaw said Ms Prior appeared to have had numerous workplace occurrences that she had perceived as bullying, harassment and racial vilification.
“It appears that these experiences continue to cause distress to Ms Prior in relation to her perceptions of justice,” she said.
It's amazing - and worrying - how many Regressives seem to struggle with the idea that anyone could not base their morals on identity politics.
hey author
you are the extremist who is threatening our way of life
now use your freedom of speech to shut the fuck up
what do we define as hate speech? personally i just tend to ignore the negativity i get from people even if they are throwing hate filled words at me. i can live without the pieces of shit in society the ones just looking to actually hurt people not just hurt feelings but the kinds of people who will go out of their way to act on their words. as for the people who just hurl hurtful insults and shit i just cant be assed with them. most of the time its usually the person angrily insulting you who has the problem i mean if they didn't have the problem they wouldn't just threaten and harass a person right? that's just me though i hear insults constantly in my line of work iv just learned to not put to much weight behind peoples words.
Why does the 35-39 age range have anything to do with it?
LGBTQI, immigrants
So let me guess... if you were to voice displeasure with men exposing themselves to little girls in the locker room, or with the violent roaming gangs formed by immigrant men, this woman would demand you be sent prison?
But free speech activists don't want to be free of consequences. They want to be allowed to say controversial things without being arrested.
Oh dear
Why would you be afraid of letting people show you who they are? You may not like what they say, but I'd rather be able to identify the crazies than not. Let them dig their own graves.
"freedom to say what you want without consequence". That's not how it works sweetie. You have the right to say what you want, and the responsinility to face the consequences thereof.
Are people really that stupid that they think "free speech" means "consequence free platform"?
I feel like this person doesn’t understand how freedom of speech works.
I can say offensive things until I’m blue in the face. I cannot incite violence, endanger the public safety, or make false statements about someone for personal gain.
I think that the qualifier for “hate speech” should be limited to making credible threats against certain groups. I also think that hate speech should be blind to race, creed, or sexuality. Anyone who singles out a group of people with the distinct motivation of advocating violence against that target group, has used hate speech to commit an assault. However, I think it is a slippery slope to try and codify it as law. I’d rather live in a world where we express ourselves freely (and suffer the proverbial slings and arrows) and have the occasional Nazi to deal with, rather than a society that has thoughtcrime.
As an Asian man, what she doesn't realize is that I don't give a shit what angry white supremacists say and that I care even less about what liberal "journalists" like her dribble out of their cum swallowers
So that means that content will be censored
They added an I now? What's that stand for?
I have a scoop
For someone that makes a living on the written word she sure as hell has no idea what freedom of speech actually is.
Woman.
Not surprised, let's face it, the only way their trainwreck of an ideology survives is if no one is allowed to point out its flaws.
Australians love the ABC, I don't fucking get it.
Yeah, that "old white man" is the whole reason you have a career. Her singing is alright (lyrics are painfully trite) but her dad is a recording engineer who owns his own studio and her great-great grandfather was the co-owner of Macy's department stores. She was born into an insanely wealthy family and was never not going to be a musician (unless she didn't want to be one).
She's basically Lena Dunham 2.0 (spoiled little rich girl from New York whose career was secured from the moment they were born). Nothing she says should matter to anyone.
Well what shock ... another regressive with a life full of privilege demanding victim points.
If two dudes flirting with another woman (which is none of her fucking business anyway) is her vision of hell, her life must be comfy as fuck.
Is this the girl who sings that "I won't keep on waiting for you" song I keep hearing everywhere? I knew she was crazy from the get go, dating Amandla "dreads are cultural appropriation!" Stenberg.
I wonder how she reacted to Trump getting elected. The complete rejection of the hate-filled ideology that she supported must have hurt.
If this wasn't enough, I found an article where she is literally laughing about her great-great grandparents' deaths and calling them fools......even the article's editor seems to not be able to process the disrespect, so he had to emphasize that she was "chuckling".
Yeah, that "old white man" is the whole reason you have a career. Her singing is alright (lyrics are painfully trite) but her dad is a recording engineer who owns his own studio and her great-great grandfather was the co-owner of Macy's department stores. She was born into an insanely wealthy family and was never not going to be a musician (unless she didn't want to be one).
She's basically Lena Dunham 2.0 (spoiled little rich girl from New York whose career was secured from the moment they were born). Nothing she says should matter to anyone.
Well what shock ... another regressive with a life full of privilege demanding victim points.
If two dudes flirting with another woman (which is none of her fucking business anyway) is her vision of hell, her life must be comfy as fuck.
She is the definition of privileged yet she still acts like she is opressed. Be thankful you were born rich instead of wishing you were born poor.
Is this the girl who sings that "I won't keep on waiting for you" song I keep hearing everywhere? I knew she was crazy from the get go, dating Amandla "dreads are cultural appropriation!" Stenberg.
I wonder how she reacted to Trump getting elected. The complete rejection of the hate-filled ideology that she supported must have hurt.
If this wasn't enough, I found an article where she is literally laughing about her great-great grandparents' deaths and calling them fools......even the article's editor seems to not be able to process the disrespect, so he had to emphasize that she was "chuckling".
Really?
So I can use whatever pronoun I think fits you best Author?
They are just pronouns after all.
Serves us right for being cis, I guess.
Really?
So I can use whatever pronoun I think fits you best Author?
They are just pronouns after all.
Serves us right for being cis, I guess.
"Tofurky is turkey."
Taking it at face value the only response is:
No they aren't. What are you talking about?
Beyond that, it's very Poe.
This is technically accurate, insomuch as they are biological organisms.
"Tofurky is turkey."
Taking it at face value the only response is:
No they aren't. What are you talking about?
Beyond that, it's very Poe.
This is technically accurate, insomuch as they are biological organisms.
Oh great, the TERFs have arrived.
I wonder where this person thinks babies come from
She’s a lesbian that’s into a girl that ain’t into her, 100%.
By this own logic the human race would've died out in it's first generation.
Heh ... the radical feminist lesbian recruitment drive is still in full swing I see.
I remember when the big push was 'born that way' ... now they are trying their own version of conversion therapy.
I wonder how it will get played in the media once the femcels start going for long drives on the sidewalk like the male version.
Wait, is she saying male gayness is unnatural?
Sounds like someone can't get a man to love her
Sounds like a thirsty lesbian.
To be fair, this particular flavour of horseshit isn't anything new. Radfems have been spouting this nonsense since at least the 1980s.
Women are naturally attracted to men to ensure their genes are passed down. This is simple biology that all creatures (yes, even humans, no matter how different we are from other species) live to reproduce.
I'm fine with this. Go tell all the radfems this is true. At least men don't have to worry about their blackmail.
This is either a troll, or a lesbian that’s attracted to a straight girl. Seriously, she can’t be that brain dead. If it was a learned thing then why can women have children? Did she have the birds and the bees talk? Lol.
The party of science.
true but for lesbians instead.
Change men to chad and you have a rather generic sounding incel post. So I guess this is just another femcel.
So every crush I've ever had is fake and invalid then?Good to know
... i mean geneticist have found that a certain group of genes actually is the first of many reasons why things are heterosexual.... but never mind that.
Bait bait bait bait bait.
Fuck this sub has way too much shit.
Good ol radfems. This ideology comes from the same place as " remove our genitals and embrace androgny"
Surely has to be a troll ?
I wonder where this person thinks babies come from
She’s a lesbian that’s into a girl that ain’t into her, 100%.
By this own logic the human race would've died out in it's first generation.
Lesbian incel?
Heh ... the radical feminist lesbian recruitment drive is still in full swing I see.
I remember when the big push was 'born that way' ... now they are trying their own version of conversion therapy.
I wonder how it will get played in the media once the femcels start going for long drives on the sidewalk like the male version.
Wait, is she saying male gayness is unnatural?
Sounds like someone can't get a man to love her
Sounds like a thirsty lesbian.
To be fair, this particular flavour of horseshit isn't anything new. Radfems have been spouting this nonsense since at least the 1980s.
Women are naturally attracted to men to ensure their genes are passed down. This is simple biology that all creatures (yes, even humans, no matter how different we are from other species) live to reproduce.
I'm fine with this. Go tell all the radfems this is true. At least men don't have to worry about their blackmail.
This is either a troll, or a lesbian that’s attracted to a straight girl. Seriously, she can’t be that brain dead. If it was a learned thing then why can women have children? Did she have the birds and the bees talk? Lol.
The party of science.
true but for lesbians instead.
Change men to chad and you have a rather generic sounding incel post. So I guess this is just another femcel.
So every crush I've ever had is fake and invalid then?Good to know
... i mean geneticist have found that a certain group of genes actually is the first of many reasons why things are heterosexual.... but never mind that.
Bait bait bait bait bait.
Fuck this sub has way too much shit.
Good ol radfems. This ideology comes from the same place as " remove our genitals and embrace androgny"
Surely has to be a troll ?
If this dude is being serious, how can he even "understand her experience" by taping a fucking pad onto his face, like what's his logic behind this
I found this and really can't tell if it's real or not but I really hope it's satire
Um...why the hell did I unblur this.
this feels like some fetish shit with a joke caption added
Im refuse to believe this is anything but a troll
Uhhhhhhh...
Imagine being that much of a cuck
Might be a good idea to tag this NSFW?
Or is it already tagged that way? My browser is messing up.
Even if this is real or fake that is so fucking disgusting.
I know the caption is just added afterwards, but that is seriously unhygenic.
Alright, stop the world, I want to get off.
I unblurred it because I didn't check the sub and thought it was from r/fatsquirrelhate. I was disappointed.
guy: hey gf can i have your pad
gf: to throughout
guy: yeah
actually puts it on his face like a boss
infection time
😫🤢🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🧐🤮🤮🤮
That's just a kink.
Nothing about that teaches you anything about her experience.
What would be more like her experience is to eat a bunch of taco Bell with fire sauce then wear a diaper instead of using the toilet.
How does this arrangement come up?
Even if he’s a fetishist (he totally is), how do you broach this subject?
Humanity has declined.
What the fuck have you brought upon this cursed land
Three words:
IT. IS. UNSANITARY.
what a fucking cuck faggoteer
dry heaving. What that actual fuck.
No they need to go further. Much further.
This is the kind of guy who gets off to women in bathrooms. Like if he hasn’t been caught peeping in a women’s bathroom or hiding in a portapotty it’s only a matter of time.
You know it's bad when you can't tell if something like this is serious or not.
Dude, you're gonna blow the sub's cover! Gotta be really super subtle about obscuring the agenda.
Here we have a super beta.
Image probably taken from a fetish page, and the text is a joke.
Oh god oh fuck! Why did I watch?! My eyes!!!
No matter how many times I see this, it still remains fucking disgusting. What a loser.
This has been reposted here a few times. This is some fetish shit and the poster is trying to get people to indulge in his fetish without their consent.
If it's real and he tried to break up with her who wants to bet she would get fuck tons of sympathy and he would be called an asshole
😷
If this dude is being serious, how can he even "understand her experience" by taping a fucking pad onto his face, like what's his logic behind this
I found this and really can't tell if it's real or not but I really hope it's satire
Um...why the hell did I unblur this.
now this is degenerate
this feels like some fetish shit with a joke caption added
Im refuse to believe this is anything but a troll
Uhhhhhhh...
Imagine being that much of a cuck
Might be a good idea to tag this NSFW?
Or is it already tagged that way? My browser is messing up.
Even if this is real or fake that is so fucking disgusting.
I know the caption is just added afterwards, but that is seriously unhygenic.
Alright, stop the world, I want to get off.
I unblurred it because I didn't check the sub and thought it was from r/fatsquirrelhate. I was disappointed.
guy: hey gf can i have your pad
gf: to throughout
guy: yeah
actually puts it on his face like a boss
infection time
😫🤢🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🧐🤮🤮🤮
That's just a kink.
Nothing about that teaches you anything about her experience.
What would be more like her experience is to eat a bunch of taco Bell with fire sauce then wear a diaper instead of using the toilet.
How does this arrangement come up?
Even if he’s a fetishist (he totally is), how do you broach this subject?
Humanity has declined.
What the fuck have you brought upon this cursed land
Three words:
IT. IS. UNSANITARY.
what a fucking cuck faggoteer
dry heaving. What that actual fuck.
No they need to go further. Much further.
This is the kind of guy who gets off to women in bathrooms. Like if he hasn’t been caught peeping in a women’s bathroom or hiding in a portapotty it’s only a matter of time.
You know it's bad when you can't tell if something like this is serious or not.
Dude, you're gonna blow the sub's cover! Gotta be really super subtle about obscuring the agenda.
Here we have a super beta.
Image probably taken from a fetish page, and the text is a joke.
Oh god oh fuck! Why did I watch?! My eyes!!!
No matter how many times I see this, it still remains fucking disgusting. What a loser.
This has been reposted here a few times. This is some fetish shit and the poster is trying to get people to indulge in his fetish without their consent.
If it's real and he tried to break up with her who wants to bet she would get fuck tons of sympathy and he would be called an asshole
😷
pLeASe cONsIdEr ThAt iN tHE fUTuRe
bears a lot of
As a bearkin, like, wtf.
Mocking snowflakes for being childishly sensitive and pathetically fragile has nothing to do with disabled people ... and that fact that regressives try to pretend that it does is an example of the low regard they hold people who are actually developmentally challenged.
Although I'm still toying with my theory that regressives are people who have, through indoctrination and embracing their ideology, actually become developmentally challenged.
THe SpoNgE Bob mEMe iS AbLIsT
And here I just don't like it because it's usually used by people who think repeating something in a stupid voice is a counterargument.
Which one of those spongebob memes is offensive the are quite a lot of spongebob memes.
If we cant even use the spongebob meme then these people really aren’t leaving much room for comedy if we can’t offend a single person
I have never once seen this hand gesture. It's weird, there's always talk of how terribly mocking people are towards disabled people, but I have only ever seen people either treat them as fair as you would someone else, or at worst just sorta ignore them best they can.
Whoa whoa whoa, I thought the meme was him mocking someone sarcastically. Developmentally disabled people do not sound like that.
If that person doesn't understand that, go ahead and tell them to fuck off and stay in their lane.
FYI, I don't care. Be offended. Big deal. Put on your big sponge pants and get the fuck over it.
How many disabled people type like ThIS?
Im sorry..again...abelist is a thing?
pLeASe cONsIdEr ThAt iN tHE fUTuRe
bears a lot of
As a bearkin, like, wtf.
Mocking snowflakes for being childishly sensitive and pathetically fragile has nothing to do with disabled people ... and that fact that regressives try to pretend that it does is an example of the low regard they hold people who are actually developmentally challenged.
Although I'm still toying with my theory that regressives are people who have, through indoctrination and embracing their ideology, actually become developmentally challenged.
fYi, ThErE's PeOpLe OuT tHeRe, LiKe Me, WhO fInD tHe MiXeD-cAsE sPoNgEbOb MeMe To Be AbLeIsT.
mOcKiNg PeOpLe LiKe ThAt BeArS a LoT oF sImIlArItY tO mOcKiNg DeVeLoPmEnTaLlY dIsAbLeD fOlKs, PeOpLe WiTh SpEeCh ImPeDiMeNtS, aNd VaRiOuS oThEr FoRmS oF dIsAbIlItY aNd NeUrOdIvErGeNcE. wHeN tHaT sOrT oF mOcKiNg Is DoNe OfFlInE, iT iS oFtEn AcCoMpAnIeD bY a LiMp HaNd BeInG bAnGeD aGaInSt ThE cHeSt, A sMaCk On ThE fOrEhEaD wItH a DuUuUuUuUh!
So, PlEaSe CoNsIdEr ThAt In ThE fUtUrE.
THe SpoNgE Bob mEMe iS AbLIsT
And here I just don't like it because it's usually used by people who think repeating something in a stupid voice is a counterargument.
Which one of those spongebob memes is offensive the are quite a lot of spongebob memes.
If we cant even use the spongebob meme then these people really aren’t leaving much room for comedy if we can’t offend a single person
I have never once seen this hand gesture. It's weird, there's always talk of how terribly mocking people are towards disabled people, but I have only ever seen people either treat them as fair as you would someone else, or at worst just sorta ignore them best they can.
Whoa whoa whoa, I thought the meme was him mocking someone sarcastically. Developmentally disabled people do not sound like that.
If that person doesn't understand that, go ahead and tell them to fuck off and stay in their lane.
FYI, I don't care. Be offended. Big deal. Put on your big sponge pants and get the fuck over it.
How many disabled people type like ThIS?
Im sorry..again...abelist is a thing?
COMMENTS
They had us in the first half, not gonna lie.
“heterophobia isn’t real”
also wants to forget hetero people exist
I was smiling for the first half, and then it instantly vanished in the second part.
Expand More Comments
So our Author is so heterophobic that people attacking heterosexual people triggers them.
And our Author denies that heterophobia exists.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the first step in dealing with a problem admitting that you HAVE that problem?
In which case our Author may need professional help.
It's 2019...how do people not know it's "anyway" not "anyways".
forget hetero people exsisting im amazed other people exsist!.
Well, you forgot the shift key exists. So you've got that going for you, I guess.
This is seriously the most blatant bait come on
r/yesyesyesno
Hypocrite