That’s like discriminating against all Asian people because Kim Jong Un exists
If you're a Muslim tired of being lumped in with terrorists, maybe you should take it up with the terrorists who give you a bad name instead of the non-Muslims who have to be in guard 24/7 because of them.
They forget women are rapists and criminals too. This is not a gender issue.
Expand More Comments
I am a woman who is not on guard 24/7.
Apparently I am doing this whole woman-ing thing wrong.
As long as we can apply group guilt to others, I'm totally on board with this. Steven Universe fans will have much to answer for.
Set virtue signal to maximum!
Men are more likely to be mugged but unlike women, men don't live in fear.
That's the same logic incels use to justify their hatred towards women. Coincidence?
Haven't encountered any that I know about my entire life but I'll keep on the lookout, sweetheart.
Oh shit I didn't even think of this. I'mma bring it up in the Man meeting today.
Wanna know who stands up to male rapers, attackers, and general arseholes?
Don't project your paranoia onto me. I am on guard 24/7, but not because of men, I just watch too much Criminal Minds until I scare myself stupid. At least I know my fear is my own damn fault 😂
Just look at this monstrous grin. That's how apex trans murderer looks like.
I can't disagree with them when it comes to the atrocious grammar.
In order for it not to be a preference, then it would have to be true that you are entitled to having sex with people, and view their consent as invalid because they're cis.
How is not finding transgenders attractive indicative of "transphobia", when a phobia is an irrational fear/aversion to something?
Sorry Alice and Aiden, but your drugged and mangled bodies don't hold a candle to the actual thing.
Ah - the trans incel concept: If you won't fuck me that's bigotry.
I can't read the girl's dating profile clearly, but it appears trans people are showing her their naked butts? She'd rather they not, which is....normal.
There are trans women with gender dysphoria, which is a genuine mental issue that deserves sympathy.
And then there are men that are narcissistic and autistic and have just a splash of Incel in them, and they decide to become trans trenders and then terrorize women that still won't fuck them.
Something needs to be done about the trans trenders. They're the loudest about "transphobia" right now.
Getting rocks thrown at you and other forms of violence is different from someone not wanting to fuck you. One is an issue trans people go through. The other is trans trenders trying to milk the current political climate to feed their egos.
If you put "gay" on your dating profile, that's not a preference. That's misogyny.
I thought it was better to describe someone as a human with a disorder, instead of identifying them only by disorder (like it overrides their other qualities) Now it's the other way around.
Am I the only one who, as an autistic person (or is that person with autism?), is getting a bit fed up with all these 'organisations' popping up and trying to make sweeping statements on our behalf?
As my mom tells me, 'negro' was PC (listen to mlk), and black was racist. Lol ppl and words
When I was studying psychology at uni, one of the things they were very hot on was using 'person first' language in essays, and you'd get marked down for saying 'autistic person' as opposed to 'person with autism', the reason they gave being that disability doesn't define a person. Funny how things change.
I personally prefer sperg. It's short, goes straight to the point, and sounds hilarious.
Not being really up on this subject, and given that the url for the site is right there I went and had a look.
We believe every individual has the right to chose the language used about them.
Nope. Sorry. You have the right to describe yourself the way you choose. You do not have the right to tell others how to speak.
You are welcome to explain to me why you want me to change my choice of words, but you are NOT welcome to demand that I change.
I don't care if you're on the spectrum or not, I don't give anyone the authority to choose what words I am required to use.
I sometimes refer to myself as a "sperg burglar" or just a "sperg" in general.
How did we go so many comments without anyone saying "assburger"?
You would have to be autistic to sperg out this much about the distinction.
As someone with Asperger's (not full on autism but enough to speak about it) I really couldn't care less what you call me in the books. If I had to pick one to call me in person I'd say I'm "person with autism" because "autistic person" just sounds more blatantly like a disability. You don't say "cancerous person" you say "person with cancer".
I prefer 'Person of Autism". Thank you.
I’m on the spectrum and I couldn’t care less which term you use. I’m autistic. I have autism. Both descriptors are equally accurate, but to me, “person with autism” just seems like you’re needlessly adding more syllables.
I mean I can see why this is. Calling someone a “colored person” is putting their racial appearance before the person themselves, while calling someone a “person of color” puts the person first and adds the color as an appearance trait.
This reminds me of the "I'm bipolar" versus "I have bipolar (disorder)" controversy.
This comic is about all the sociopathic progressives that claim to have autism to excuse their own abusiveness
I remember back when I studied psychology that we were in the process of replacing “an X person” with “a person with X”, as a way of highlighting that the illness does not define the person, that the individual is more than simply a diagnostic label.
But I guess we’re regressing in this now, like so many other things.
Yeah I carry my Autism with me at all times. /s
I say colored person because it's less syllables than person of color.
Last fall I took a special education and inclusion class for my teaching licensure. We were explicitly told to use the “Person First Language” when talking about students with disorders. Saying “my student with autism” is more appropriate and inclusive for the classroom than “my autistic student”. Essentially, it’s important to recognize that students (and people) are more than their disability and that their disability isn’t the defining aspect to their character.
This exemplifies why this mindset is destructive really nicely. Autism should be seen as an aspect of someones personality, not an all defining label to rule all others. Having to approach people seeing them as being only autism sue, rather than sue who has autism, is gonna make it extremely difficult to relate to them on anything, especially their autism. Being treated that way would also entrench you in the idea all you are is your condition, and so you must exaggerate this ass much as possible
I was diagnosed with autism. I don't care what you use
Um, as an "autistic person" I'd much rather prefer "person with autism". What do I know though, I'm only autistic.
A person is not their condition. They are a person first and foremost they just happen to have a disorder.
Adjectives aren't accessories. Go back to middle school.
This is getting way too confusing. Just don't call them anything other than human at this point.
I kind of have to agree with this one. You're autistic, you don't "have autism". It's not a god damn disease you catch at daycare.
i feel like “person with autism” is preferable because it emphasises the whole person, not just their autism. it’s a pillar of the person’s identity, not the whole person.
I prefer identity first ¯_(ツ)_/¯
This shit DOESN'T WORK because you still continue to use WHITE PEOPLE. In the English language it's more assertive to use [adjective noun] over [noun of/with adjective]. When you're using the former like 'white people' along with the latter like 'people of color', your brain picks it up. 'People of color' is passive language. Not to mention associating one's race with a disease/disability has unfortunate implications.
Use 'color people' if you want. That's not racist, that's not 'colored people'.
To be fair, this movement has some actual context behind it, and isn't entirely stupid.
The long and short is that one of the biggest and most well known organisations in support of autistic people is Autism Speaks, and basically everyone they "support" who reads into these things hates them because they're awful assholes. Then people come along and try to make decisions on behalf of the autistic community because they're apparently too stupid to do it themselves or defend themselves.
The LGBT is allowed to coin their own terms or claim their own words. For better or for worse.
Autistic people have to fight to have nobody fuck with the words they already have.
Autistic people was never a slur and certain groups are trying to erase it because they arbitrarily decided no they're people first as though that is at all how semantics works. Changing it is dumb. Neither one of them is offensive, they're functionally identical, but one of them is now the spawn of shitty corporate virtue signalling and is associated with taking the identities of autistic people into some random executive's hands and, even if it's completely innocuous, is a dick move. It's a matter of principle and all that. It's not about the words, it's about not letting choices be made for the community without actually factoring in what anyone in it wants. Just generally not sitting idly by while the man treats them like children and makes dumb, meaningless choices on their behalf for no reason. And obviously the autistic community is gigantic, diverse and fractured. There's no one prevailing zeitgeist on which everyone in it agrees. None of what I'm saying should be applied to every autistic person. But then, that doesn't stop shitty organisations from making choices for all of them and assuming they're all brain-dead children, and that's kind of the whole idea.
Coloured people, while perhaps technically accurate if you think about the words literally, has connotations, and is associated with people being shitty in the past. It's a completely different issue.
I totally understand why you'd lump this in with Tumblr in Action, because this image doesn't explain things very well, was probably just made as part of a bandwagon without actually caring about the context and just accepting that one phrase is better than the other as though the semantics actually matter instead of it being a matter of one being associated with dicks and the other defiance of dicks, and also just visually looks doofy as shit, but all in all I don't think this belongs here.
Edit: And I'm just gonna be fair for a second, this is also a case of somebody deciding one is better than the other and making an organisation about it, and I'm sure some autistic people just don't care and don't want this website making the choice for them either. Just gonna point that out. The point is, there's context that's missing, and that context is probably convoluted and complex as fuck, even if the issue probably doesn't matter.
Plenty of races would do that? Most civilizations in history has slavery, it wasn't exactly rare. Who's to say other messed up stuff didn't happen either?
“Look I’d NEVER make this a race thing but I hate white people.”
She obviously never studied or even heard about world history.
Theres also literally a slave trade going on in Sub-Saharan African countries and North Africa/middle east right now.
All of them, white people are the only ones who would hate on themselves for it at the same time though.
TIL America is a race...?
Because every person working for ICE is white.
I don't know, weren't there a lot of arab and black slavers? Didn't the turks take christian children from their parents and made them their elite soldiers?
Although I guess when they do something bad, Arabs/Turks count as white.
Holy shit, that one word makes me so fucking furious. Imagine blaming the people of the US for the crimes of Nazi Germany. How fucking detached from reality is this bitch?
I wonder if she realizes that it was also white people who defeated Nazi Germany. Russians, French, Americans, British, Australian = All white people.
The thought process must go something like this:
America is white majority (even though many of these immigration policies were passed by Obama).
Therefore, "America" is white. (A=B)
Nazi Germany was majority white and tried to create an Aryan ethno-state through systematic, state-sponsored genocide.
Therefore, Nazi Germany is white (C=B)
If A=B=C, then A=C and America is trying to create an Aryan ethnostate through systematic , state sponsored genocide.
Jesus fucking Christ. They do it because the "parents" are in US Marshal custody, aka JAIL while they plead their case and/or their asylum request is adjuticated.
Would you prefer actual fucking generational prison camps?
And it's not like they don't get the kids BACK, nor is anyone being marched into an oven, idiots.
As to "what other race".. look up Japan can 1942.
How do these people cognitively disassociate themselves in such a manner where they are seriously arguing that children should be put in prison with their criminal parents?
This weeks entire narrative attempt baffles me.
If you don’t want to get separated from your children, maybe don’t cross the border illegally??
North Korean top dogs, Arabians working for ISIS, literally every other race does horrible shit.
Cruelty knows no racial bounds.
The separation while awaiting judgment has been what we have done for a long time. It's nothing new, people are getting ginned up by the news as usual.
what other race would commit acts like this
Whites are by far the most tolerant and welcoming group of people, other countries are much stricter vis a vis immigration
The intentional misrepresentation of this issue all over the internet and mainstream media is infuriating.
“What race would do this...” All of them have and all of them will probably do it again. It’s called human history.
Also, the US is not just “white people” it’s the most diverse country and government in the world.
This is so deeply ignorant it's not even slightly funny. And I come to this sub for the laughs.
"I never try to make it a race thing. It comes naturally, like breathing."
American is a race?
Cool....more white hate. These people are racist fucks
The state separates kids from their parents all the time, it's called Child Protective Services
I don't understand this discussion. What do these people want? For kids to be sent to jail with their parents? For that to be preferential these centres must be truly terrible.
The amount of misinformation going on is insane.
The solution is simple, and is also the message we’re trying to send, DON’T bring your family across our borders illegally! If they stop doing that then we can stop aggressively enforcing THE LAW!
What is this even talking about? I'm out of the loop.
What I don't get is why our tax dollars are paying for border day care. These kids are foreign nationals with parents, just deport them and their parents together- problem solved. Or just don't allow them in at all, but that would be too simple...
You didn't give two shits when divorce happens and said meh.
I feel like they even went out of their way to make it about race. Like, there was no obvious connection to point out.
Is she refering to the human race?
I really want to buy all of Twitter a subscription to the economist and foreign affairs but I’m not convinced they can read.
These people really act like there aren’t babies getting killed in africa lmao
What about Unit 731 or The Rape of Nanking? Naw. Only white people are able to be cruel. God I hate these people.
Every race has done it and you’d be an idiot to imply otherwise.
It appears they also hate separating sentences by using proper punctuation.
If they didn’t want that to happen, maybe they shouldn’t have crossed the border illegally.
Yes, we should send the children to prison with their parents!
Man I am an idiot. For a minute I thought it was a race as in a competition and I wasnt getting it
How about only every other country on the planet?
funny that most border patrol and ice agents are Hispanics that I've ever encountered
As if thousands of Russians pouring into China would result in a wholesome reaction.
Abandoning children... Is she talking about inner city blacks?
Thank goodness no other race takes children from their parents! Thank goodness no other race does even worse things like turning them into child soldiers to serve local African warlords! Thank goodness no other race ever sold children to slavers! Thank goodness no other race sells children into sex trafficking over there in lily white Asia.
This was first happening under Obama. So are they talking about what black people do to other races?
Acts like what? Invading another nation and putting your child in danger so you can leech off people who actually work towards success as a society?
Fucking spics, am I right? BTW I'm not trying to make this a race thing.
Literally every people who has ever survived has done things like this and much worse.
How do people not know this started during the Obama presidency? And it was started by a judge deciding that you couldn't keep the kids for more then twenty days. It's only really an issue for people coming illegally, getting caught, and then claiming asylum. These are the only kids getting separated.
Have you heard of these continents called Asia and Africa and the fucked up shit that is happening/has happened there?
That's actually one place where the people arguing for more non-western history education could have a point: showing these people that white people aren't unique in this stuff, we've just generally been more successful at it.
What a fucked up worldview.
Classic Im not racist but...
This is not a race thing, this is a person/govt thing. Get it right or stop getting anything.
Riiiiight... Because all the UN dignataries and EU leaders condemning this are non-whites
The sad part is the 2,698 likes
Only white people would commit atrocities
Apparently the Rwandan and Cambodian genocides just never happened
But this is from twitter
And then they complain about the "I'm not a racist..." crowd.
Like the Rwandan genocide never happened. Fucking ignorant racist.
What is this tweet in response to?
Err I dunno any race that would jail parents for committing crimes? Jeez this is the mongol hoard cutting unborn babes from their mother's wombs these are adults knowingly doing something that could end with them separated from their kids.
Every other race allows children to be jailed with their parents, white people smdh.
Pretty sure the answer is: all.
All of the races.
It's crazy how people are influencing kids to join gangs and kill each other in popular music. 8 9 year olds with guns shootin at one another in school. . . I never try to make it a race thing but there's only one race that would do something like that in front of the whole world.
The United States of America Congress race?
“Ah, so it’s unintentional.”
Germany is putting Mexican children in cages?
Not putting children in an adult prison is a tragic thing uwu
Every race that has ever existed. It’s not a race thing, it’s a human thing.
Literally every other race. Believe it or not, most countries don't tolerate illegal immigration.
Um. Yeah. White people are all totally cool with this. TIL, Laura Bush, Rosalynn Carter, and the current FLOTUS aren't white.
Developed nations do it all the time. In New York it's called CPS.
The gang makes it a race thing.
Famous last words for a lot of people.. but for these types, one of the few times I've ever actually heard them even claim to not try to turn it into one... lol
I'm really losing my mind. How do kill a 3 yr old? I never try to make it a race thing but....
Jesus Christ it isnt the whole white race doing this, its the STATE. No matter what race the officials of a nation are, they always find a way to abuse the powers given to them by the institution of the state. So tired of these half ass accusations that just cover up the real issues at play.
My thing is, when adults commit crimes, they are ALWAYS SEPARATED FROM THEIR CHILDREN**.** Every single person in jail right now is being separated from their children solely because they refused to follow the fucking law.
A person entering this country ILLEGALLY had broken the law and is automatically a criminal. There is no gray area here. YOU SHOULD BE SEPARATED FROM YOUR CHILDREN FOR BREAKING THE LAW. Fuck, liberals are so fucking ignorant of basic legal facts, it hurts to wonder just what their thought processes are.
Also, Obama did much worse and nobody cared.
Other races alway do
Arguments about race are always retarded.
It's almost as if the majority of the population of the West is white people so when doucebaggery occurs it's statistically more likely to have been committed by white people despite it being plausible for all people of the region.
It's almost like it is a race thing since it involves a different race of people from a different country
Races have done this since the beginning of time. All races. It went by the name of "slavery" for the longest time, but the idea of stealing a child from its parents is not new. Mesopotamia (the first civilization) in the Middle East. Carthage in North Africa. The First Nations of the Americas. The people of Pre-Columbian Meso-America. The Mongols. The Chinese (notably in the Tang, Yuan, and Qing Dynasties, though they existed in other dynasties as well). Literally every race has committed these crimes. Hell, some sub-cultures around the world still have slavery today! Debt labor is common in India and Pakistan. Forced prison labor is allowed by the 13th amendment of the United States Constitution. Forced migrant labor is literally how Qatar is building itself the stadiums for the World Cup. Sex slavery is VERY common in the modern world as well (particularly, according to online, in Moldova and Laos). Bride-buying is also common (particularly in the Middle East and Southern Asia), which is essentially paying parents to take their child from them and forcing them into a life of sexual servitude and submissiveness. Forced child labor is prevalent in Haiti (a nation that literally got its start by a slave uprising). There is also a lot of human trafficking in locations such as Thailand or Central America.
Not justifying what Trump is doing (as what he is doing IS inhumane and deplorable, as can be expected from the Trump Presidency), but I think this person needs to look at the bigger, wider world, and realize this isn't a whites only thing.
“What is different now is children are being forcibly separated by parents at the border”
Regardless, fuck Trump and is racist lackeys.
You all actually defending the unlawful detainment of children who were forced to enter this country against their will? Just wondering. Whether or not it’s a race thing, it’s still disgusting that it’s going on
Did they forget that the Clinton administration signed that off? I bet she voted for Hillary too
Can’t see any child concentration camps on the Canadian border 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
"Pointing out my racism is the real racism!"
Omg I thought she was asking for advice on how to separate children from their parents for a minute
I like to think that the gypsy curse I spat at a hippie is working. "May everything you know and love be co-opted and marketed back to you."
Ever since they won the gay marriage battle they don’t know what the fuck to do with themselves. I feel like they wish it was still illegal so they wouldn’t have to grasp at straws to convey their victim hood
There was a stink over this years Sydney Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras. The NYTimes, such as it is, did an article on it.
And the inclusion of so many corporations has come at the expense of grass-roots activists and longtime participants. Gay Sydney Australia, a community organization, was denied a spot in the parade because of the many floats, and a teachers organization was allowed to march only after a petition was circulated.
I think you'll find that all the large Pride parades are lost to corporate influence.
Like a bucket of fucking crabs.
This is not how you build a healthy community, this is how you foster prejudice and tension between in-groups and make them split.
I'm just gonna say... corporations sponsor a lot of things, even the people "Anti-consumer, anti-corporation blah blbha blah capitalism is bad" crowd like...
Dear OP, it looks like you're white too...
So shut the fuck up.
I'M MORE SPECIALER THAN YOUUUUUU!
I would really like to ask these people what they will do once the Corps realise that the millions they are wasting in feel-good campaigns to try and win minorities over isnt working and wont ever work and instead decide to go back to simply making money, ruthlessly if they have to.
pride movements only accomplished as much as they did due to the support from a potent mixture of the public + corporations/businessentrepreneurs + philanthropists + sympathetic politicians.
SJWs are already turning large portions of the Public against them, and the next couple generations are predicted to be ever increasingly conservative, social conservative or classically liberal/libertarian.
Philanthropists no longer touch these movements with a 30 foot barge pole as too many have had those they try to help turn against them over every tiny percieved slighht.
The number of sympathetic politicans is dwindling outside of only a handful of countries and the rest are apathetic or actively working against them at the very least for ideological reasons.
Corporations and business are all they have left, and public pressure is already leading to more and more corps and companies deciding to go fuck-the-rules mode.
Keep attacking whites then get mad at increasing white ethno supporters
LOL corporations aren't supporting gay prides or rights, they're supporting gay wallets. Capitalism.
What's funny is the only guys who really seem to care about masculinity/how masculine they are, are douchey meatheads, closeted guys, and feminist men. 95% of men I've met just do their own thing and don't stress over every little action, worried that it may appear effeminate. Most men are just naturally masculine and are happy and well adjusted that way.
I remember watching this super cringey video talking about being a gay man trying to hide his sexuality through a hyper masculine persona and how masculinity is detrimental to gay men, etc. At one point it even said, "Red meat only, chicken and fish is for women." and I was just like, "What world do these people live in? Do they really think men live their lives like this?"
I will say though, the only time I've even gotten shit from a man for what I've eaten, the clothes I wear, music I listen to, etc. is from femme gay men who tell me I'm "too butch" and am a self-loathing gay. I've had more pressure put on me to be effeminate and have been told I'm a "bad gay" for not being so than to be masculine.
Okay but what's the difference between a t-shirt and a basic t-shirt, besides $7.95?
For all you know, the shirt maker could be protesting the fact that men receive 63% longer sentences on average than women do for the same crimes. Don't be so quick to judge, OP! Masculinity is quite literally a prison.
Credit to Adam Ellis @adamtots
These days doing something like that takes less than 10 minutes of effort. I take shits longer than that some days.
Oh fuck off. Who do you think is going to be wearing this? "Non binary" women who rely on using male style and aesthetics for the purpose of being androgynous. Nothing wrong with that, but don't try to be slick about it.
Can you imagine the outrage if someone put "Femininity is a Prison" on a shirt?
Yes, gender roles are a thing. So?
Sometimes I love Adam Ellis (@adamtots) and his comics and then other times he produces material like this and I have to roll my eyes. It's a case where I have to respect the artist and his humour while not necessarily agreeing with his ideological viewpoints and learning to look past them.
Exclusively whites kill us....
She must not know
All white people do is murder and rape and destroy everything. Would it not be like totally fair and justified if we like did all that to all them first?
-most of Tumblr
Killed for entering his white girlfriends house? When and where.
Isn't sectarian violence one of the biggest issues in a lot of Muslim countries?
Also lol at thinking serious relationships lead to marriage is an Islamic thing.
Ok I am Mexican and whenever I read a commentary like this it make me cringe and a little mad because is like they say only one race is violent and cruel and then they act like that is not racist, and me being from a country that is no really racially diverse but have a lot of violence I know that is the individual who is violent, is the decisions they make what cause this no race or religion but is just easy to be racist because then you have a boogie man to attack and fear but we can't lie to our self's if you start to act like this you only become hatefult and bitter and one day you become the kind of people you fear and despise, a racist everything because you didn't accept other people just because they are different and you have preconceived ideas about them
"I don't like what some people of this race do, so I'm going to apply all those stereotypes across the whole group and hold everyone accountable for the behavior of an individual" - apparently not racism
Prejudice exists on all sides.
“Your ancestors were shitty to my ancestors. Therefore I will now treat you like shit when I personally interact with you.”
Yeah makes sense. This is totally how we have mature, nuanced discussions about race/racism/history and solve the continued problems.
Can we just start over? Just hit the reset button on the human race? Please?
You can pray to your imaginary sky-being all you want honey, but it's not up to you who your brother loves and marries. Race/gender/sexuality, love is a beautiful thing, and not everyone is so lucky to find it.
So, screw common ground is the plan? Refuse to try to understand one another? Descend into tribal chaos? The truth of the matter is that white people by in large are very open and accepting of others. But not for long. You can only castigate someone for so long before they give up on diplomacy.
How mixed is mixed enough for this person? Are we back to the one drop rule?
So she's...what race exactly? She's Muslim, but is saying white people colonised her country. Last time I checked, the Islamic world colonised the European world for some time. If she's not Arab, then is she black? Then still, white people did not colonise her country.
So is she Native, then? I've literally never heard of a Native American Muslim but maybe that's out there...idk...
Good lord, the hypocrisy is just completely lost on these Tumblr people.
The concept of collective guilt is maybe the most regressive idea that the "progressive" Tumblr crowd espouses.
OP in the future make sure to color the name censors differently so it's totally clear to dumbasses like me that they're different people
It's even more silly because "men" don't share a common ideology.
It's worse than that.
The OP is propagating the myth that women need to be on guard 24/7 ... and they don't, unless they spend time in places where everyone is on guard 24/7.
"Hey dude, can you stop raping for a moment? You're making the rest of us look bad."
Change man to black and it's hate speech
Just how many rapists are out there?
Not trying to undermine the terrible things that happen, but do they expect a rapist hiding behind every tree?
It's even more apt when you realise that men are much more likely to be victims of violence than women, yet all the focus is on women. Similarly Muslims in the middle-east are much more likely to be victims of Islamic terrorism than non-muslims in the west, yet all the focus is on the latter.
It's very hard to hold your so called peers accountable for being shitheads when you know literally zero that fit the bill.
Yes and who arrests, charges, and guards the rapists and attackers when they're caught? The 100% female police and justice system... Oh wait that's mostly men! It's almost like most men want women to be safe!
It's not a perfect comparison… a religion or ideology isn't inherent in one's genes. It's chosen (or eventually a choice is made), and it's not insane to think there would be some connection between the teachings of their group and their behavior towards others. Others who have chosen that ideology could reasonably be expected to rein in extreme members of their own group, or, failing that, to excommunicate them and make it clear they're unwelcome.
Yelling at someone for being a man or woman is much less defensible. No one chose anything, no one necessarily believes the same things as another in the same gender.
All Muslims are terrorists and if you get upset when I say that it means you are one of them that I'm talking about! /s
Except everyone has a choice in whether or not they're a Muslim. Whereas I have no choice in being a man.
It's even worse because you can choose to be muslim but you can't choose to be male.
I hate tumblr
Its not hard to say "SOME men are horrible rapists" rather than "ALL men are horrible rapists"
I'll just scream at every American that has a Tumblr account that he's an asshole because of Trump.
urg, bad example.
The base here is faulty, one is a choice to join a group, one is genetics.
You choose to join a group that has commandments to commit terrible acts, even if you ignore those specific commandments.
You don't choose your sex, you are born with it.
But, what's Assad doing then? Not Curbing terrorists? Motherfucker destroyed ISIS when only two or three countries sided with him (With the help of Putin and Khamenei) and the whole world was against him
Eh its not perfect, it's awful and misleading. No way 30% of men are supporting rapists
I propose a WebEx for all men, put this to bed once and for all. I'm sure if we all compare diaries we'll be able to get something in
the original tweet implies you cant condemn those actions while at the same time saying it doesnt apply to a whole group
It took me way too long to realize that those tweets came from two different people. The red color on both of them threw me off
curb your terrorists
These males who do this shit are so obviously guilty of their own hollow accusations.
But.. their book literally says to murder all kinds of people casually and that if you dislike the idea of it, you are wrong because god knows better then you do.
Sure, a lot of them are ignorant to their own book but the ones who read it inspire really high extremism rates out of their group.
A really bad comparison in my opinion.
but muzzies are all the same.
Hasn't pew research shown that a majority of Muslims support the oppressive and violent parts of their religion even in western nations. That doesn't mean I am saying that Muslims are all terrorists, but stupidity is rampant in the religion while what that retard said about men as a whole holds no basis in reality
"This just in: all men are rapists!
Next up, all phones are Samsung & every human has blonde hair...
Watch us at 7, here on TumblrNews™"
Someone needs to nuke tumblr already.
Read the korran if you think that's perfect.
To be fair, this still isn't that representative. When muslims do attacks, they do it in the name of their religion that's shared between them. That doesn't make them responsible but there should be some effort by leaders in the Muslim communities to make it clear this isn't representative of what their religion stands for. People choose to be Muslim or at least choose to stay Muslim.
because I have a dick and someone else has a dick doesn't mean we have anything else in common. If I became a trans woman yet still had a dick am I responsible, are trans men also responsible?
I think it can a bit of both ways. Men in general need to call out the toxic displays when they see them. If there is something you see that you disagree with, call it out. It's also a big debate within Muslim communities since there are a bunch of moderates that criticize all the more strict interpretations you see in Saudi Arabia and whatnot but it's always done in hush hush vs loud and proud.
So collective guilt is bad. You shouldn't lump a group according to the behavior of the extremities and in fact, it can push the ones in the middle to said extremes. However, it is good to encourage the neutrals to push back against the extremes, especially if they don't want to be represented by them.
Well to play the devils advocate, you could argue it’s important to uphold certain values within your slice of society. I know plenty of guys who don’t take sexual assault seriously and either are super dismissive of it or claim it’s ok to hook up with people when they are super drunk cause “they let themselves get that drunk”. There is a problem with people not keeping people around them like their friends and family in check, because they are too passive about sexual assault. If everyone took it more seriously, less people would feel comfortable breaking that moral boundary and committing assault. And sure not all men are to blame for the actions of some, which is important, but on a larger scale, it is a problem with many males, and there’s an aspect where as a male your behavior and your values affect that of other males around you.
False comparison. muslims follow an ideology created by a murderer and warlord, the ideology explicitly proscribes murder, rape, and other evils. "Men" do not proscribe to an ideology as a group.
There is a level of logic, though - many of the worst kinds of sexist men won't take any criticism from women, so if men don't tell them to shut the fuck up and stop being sexist, they'll assume it's fine.
it's not my fault i'm racist if you people do things that make me racist wut?
its a choice to be muslim
The scary part is 24.6K people liked this stupid idea.
I truly feel awful for this.
I mean, they are admitting on their tags they are heterophobic and cisphobic. Phobias are an unreasonable fear not necessarily based on reality. An arachnophobic might think spiders are evil and all are poisonous (or venomous, I don't remember which was which despite that useful meme), but that doesn't mean it is true.
Well, there are two possibilities here, and neither is great. Either A, you believe that people born straight aren't ok, meaning you are discriminating based on what people are born as. Or B, you believe sexuality is a choice, making all those religious folks that said the same thing, completely right about it. Might mean that Conversion therapy is valid even.
But in short, someone did not think that one through.
Yet somehow this moron was born.
"please don't tell gay people it's ok to be gay. it’s not ok. it'll never be ok."
See? Just swap out the word "straight" for "gay" and you sound just like your average GOP member.
But I'm sure it's not bigoted when you do it, because you're not in "power". Pfff.
This is a problem within tumblr's note system, you can't tell the ratio between comments, reblogs, and likes.
From hanging out with other vocal members of the same minority groups online, these people seem to forget that they're a small minority, and that shitting on the majority group in this manner is really not helping them in any way...
I can’t imagine a situation where I’d even say that.
Oh, what ever will I do going through life without the approval of a biggot who is off his/her/their/zhe/zhim/zher's tits? I guess I will have to just go about my privileged cishet shitlord life halfheartedly. I'm sure this person's account is an absolute dumpster fire. Because, you know gender and sexuality aren't a choice... Unless you're one of those filthy straights who ruin the lives of LGBTQ+ people with their very existence.
Needs more jpeg.
Needs more jpeg
There is still sanity left
The stupid thing is, with the way Tumblr works, most of those notes are probably calling this person out
Nah, numbers of notes means nothing.
If I know my tumblr, at least half of them are people roasting OP and other people liking the roast.
Made with Love in New York City, New Jersey & Monterrey, Mexico.