Hi HTownian25! You seem to be posting too much.
You have posted 9 times in the last day on the libertarian subreddit.
You should try and put more effort into your posts, and not link-spam.
You have posted today:
the current state of education
/r/Neoliberal exposes the truth about communism.
Third of British people believe there are Muslim 'no-go areas' in UK governed by sharia law
The REAL political compass
Charlie Kirk believing a woman without any evidence.
But they’re combating the CEO shortage
More cops in the USA died from suicide than any other cause in 2017.
What's better, metal? Or punk? HAH gotcha EU suck on that exit.
I'm not OK with this blatant disrespect of Red Fang.
Expand More Comments
Cool, I hope you enjoy being raped and murdered.
But the private police will try and put me in cages then
Hell yeah, tribal militia wars here we come!
Didnt we have just that like 4000 years ago almost everywhere on the planet? Everything was legal because there were no laws. And the likelihood of dying by another humans hand was about 50%.
this is stupid.
You have posted 13 times in the last day on the libertarian subreddit.
Mother of All Takes
This is absolutely the funniest fucking thing I have seen from the whole "pocahontas" fiasco
Accidentally making communist propaganda criticizing liberals to own the liberals
Today, the U.S. Department of Education is, essentially, a trillion-dollar bank, serving more than 40 million student borrowers.
Friendly reminder that Elon Musk is a fucking jackass.
liking jewsliking Ben Shapiro
liking Ben Shapiro
Ignoring everything else, in what world does Antifa support Saddam?
I laughed my ass off at the signed picture of Erwin rommel.
This was really lame, but "thinks Trump is Hitler" on both sides made me chuckle.
I give it two stars for humor and one star for accuracy.
Do you remember when trump openly courted the vote of neonazis?
pepperidge farm remembers
Wow there’s so many things wrong with this.
That antifa protest gun rights.
That antifa are tankies, and not ancoms.
That democrats support antifa and Trump didn’t flirt with neonazis for their vote, and that neonazis don’t run for office as Republicans.
So much is bad here, yikes.
one pretty big difference is that there are approximately 3 "nazis" in america right now, while communism, anarchism and other far-left ideologies are explicitly and openly supported and defended in our educational system and media
beats you up for liking jews
this doesn't happen, ever
widely rejected by own political party
why the fuck are they even referring to the republicans as "the nazi's own political party," wtf
this scaremongering about "nazis" is so unbelievably tiresome
Antifa are anti-fascists only in their name. Instead they are just another type of fascists out there
anarchist who loves dictators.
Another 100% accurate meme about antifa that totally understands the left.
As much as you love to paint antifa as a boogeyman, the fact is that the political Right is FAR more violent than the Left and has killed more than 10x as many people in recent years.
Regardless of the recent upswing in deaths from Left Wing terrorism since 2016, Nationalist and Right Wing terrorists have killed about 10 times as many people since 1992.
These kind of retarded ass images are exactly why nobody on the outside takes this subreddit seriously. There are so many things wrong with it, that I'm not even going to bother listing them all.
The last panel is the most accurate one... why left whyy do this to mee
/r/libertarian never directly criticizes Nazis
This image is clearly biased against the left. It’s almost as if it’s trying to say Nazis are better than Antifa.
The Nazbol symbol has nothing to do with Antifa. Besides, Nazbols (Russian branch at least) stand for culture freedom and would never beat assault ordinal people.
Antifa = modern day brown shirts, the similarities are stunning
Ah yes the Democrats, worshippers of antifa. Find me one video of a congressional Democrat saying that they are fine people
Did they stop having students read The Wave) in school? Seems like this would solve some of these issues.
Rommel signed poster? Ha
One is not liked the other.
The fact that so many of you here have problems criticizing Antifa is proof of the bottom panel. They wear all black, wear masks, and beat people up who disagree with them. They're literally the textbook definition of "bad guys," just like the dudes wearing swastikas. They're both equally tyrannical assholes. If you can't see that, then you're blinded by partisanship.
Ah.. my daily reminder of how idiotic Libertarians can be.
No one is going to come to the part of, hits you for liking Jews/Shapiro?
The 'liking' is placed there to down play natzi violence.... I think it's worse to be violent to someone because of their identity, than their thoughts...
Was good comic until last panel...
OP is a known sock puppet account, only posting this content for karma. Please downvote and move on.
Solid till the end. Babylon tries to be like the onion but never quite manages.
Ah yes, Rommell and Rosie O'Donnell - two truly equivalent people who are definitely morally comparable.
You forgot, "aided by the French because 'fuck the british!' '"
If it surprises you, read up more on it. There were significant world events in play that contributed to this victory.
There's a few things missing. America stockpiled British artillery they took, got help from France, Spain, and Prussians. The British army was also not always much better off since it was voluntarily only and joining during a war isn't always that popular. Ans yws they had a massive communication advantage, both from England (months sail away iirc) and in America where the British commander's hated each other.
But other then all that 5/7 meme.
Why stay so ignorant of history?
Bit more complicated than that.
British were at war with France directly at the time and saw the conflict as a sideshow and minor uprising.
I'm British so I don't know how this comment will go down, but here goes. The British had the resources the quash the rebellion before it really started. William Howe, the Britsh commander-in-chief, could have destroyed Washington's army at Long Island and around a fifth of American colonists were loyal to the Crown, however you have to remember we're talking about America as it was in the late 1700's. It's not like the British were losing the colony that hosted Apple, Microsoft, Starbucks, Wal-Mart etc. it was made up of cotton and tobacco farms. Back then, Jamaica was the powerhouse of the British empire since that's where sugar was produced, and sugar at that point was basically the equivalent of oil today.
Furthermore the British troops and particularly the commanders held back since they felt like they were being ordered to kill their own brothers. Sir Guy Carlton who was the Governor of Quebec, justified his lenient treatent of Patriot prisoners by saying 'Since we have tried in vain to make them acknowledge us as brothers, let us at least send them away as first cousins.' I am by no means trying to undermine what the American Patriots did because it was by no means a walk in the park, but I'm not as surprised about them winning.
Libertarians history right here
Nothing says 'Libertarian' like owning other human beings amirite
The Colonists and Founding Fathers were not libertarians, LOL.
could post the same picture about vietnam or afghanistan.
it's called asymmetric warfare and it's not about winning in the sense of winning outright, it's about outlasting as in one side just stops fighting.
> Outdated hunting equipment
The colonists had many more rifles in use than the smoothbore muskets used by the British, which were "higher tech." Muskets were faster to load, which was great for the British formations and volley fire tactics. However, the slower reload speed of a rifle was much more than offset by having triple the effective range when used with guerrilla tactics. Shooting at the British troop formations from the woods and then retreating before they could maneuver into range was pretty effective. Kind of like how dealing with a few snipers and roadside bombs in Afghanistan today doesn't make a tank battalion all that useful.
We won because India was in open rebellion and the British sent 50+ army groups there while only sending 2 army groups to America.
Thank India for our independence today.
The French would win. And in return, the historically illiterate peasants they aided would go through time mocking their military prowess.
The fact that modern libertarians think a group of notorious slaveholders were libertarian is very, VERY revealing.
two things libertarians generally don't understand
You can thank the native americans for teaching the europeans about guerilla warfare. The plain Indians were the greatest light infantry known to man that's why we named our attack helicopter after them. The Apache.
As a Libertarian, I unironically believe the founding fathers were libertarian because I'm good at history.
Oh shoot. Vietnam anyone?
There was a massive supply chain that didn't work that was a huge reason we won. Help by the French certainly was necessary as well and more.
Sometimes I’m still amazed that the colonists won.
Sounds like a martian headline in 2118...
At the time, the aggregate economic output of the rebelling American colonies exceeded that of Great Britain. And the rebel army was full of trained officers who knew the enemy tactics inside and out.
Our founding fathers were not libertarians. Between the alien and sedition act, The purchase of Louisiana and the embargo act the idea that the founding fathers believed that they their power was limited by the what constitution explicitly said is BULLSHIT. Love libertarianism or hate it. The founding fathers did not subscribe to it.
Take note: Liberty always wins.
Holy shit.... the fact that y'all claim the revolution was fought by libertarians is not only stupid but totally laughable..... just look how y'all act today. You cry like a bitch if you see a Nazi punched and run to their defense as a Nazi safety advocate. You pretty much have a fucking aneurism if you see a walgreens with a broken window.... you claim you need automatic rifles to fight a tyrannical government yet you dont do jack shit but share memes.... you wont even skip on your taxes..... give me a fucking break.
Libertarians back then asked, "how can you tell its a red coat?", and rolled around on the ground, arms flailing, knickers kicking, and tears rolling as you saw tea being dumped in the harbor. Please.... lmao!! A "revolution" to a libertarian is showing up to work on time and licking the boss's butthole squeaky clean. There is absolutely nothing "revolutionary" about a libertarian.....
The British army was the joke of Europe in the 1770's. It was small, decently trained, but employed outdated organization and doctrine. With a few exceptions, the performance of the British army in European warfare on the Continent has been quite poor.
I love this. I don’t post political things on my personal social media but I’ll post this on the 4th if July as it is on the fence. Looks like just a “go America” meme but has important implications.
Did we forget about the French? Lmao
Per title: No. Investigations, protected individuals (Witsec), troop movements in war, and intelligence members in foreign land probably aren't things you want to share. Unless you want to be the person on the wrong end of one of those...
As for hiding things. That statement seems more common on this subs memes then in the real world. Which makes it a meme I suppose.
Honestly 99℅ of all evil is out there in the open be it private or public enterprise.
Most just look the other way
We already have the names and addresses of the people responsible for gutting our economy. The conspiracy is right in front of you dude. Most of them can't resist bragging about it, look at Bezos and Musk, doing TED Talks about how they're extracting more money out of the American Working Class than ever and tucking it all away, never to be seen by non-Billionaire hands ever again.
Lets tell the Russian what the launch codes are, what could possibly go wrong?
I get where you would see this as a valid argument but the government doesn’t classify things simply because they want to hide it from the public for fear or backlash or criticism or because they did anything wrong at all. But I assume you realize this and just posted this picture as humor
It's kinda true.
But liberals are no longer socially liberal as they demand reverse racism and ban on so called hate speech
I was. Am no longer. However, I do avoid political discussion as I live in the most progressive area of the planet.
Your post reminds me of the libertarian stripper video. Sometimes, expression should be restrained.
It's probably not quite every day that Noam can be quoted on this sub, but on this occasion, he's very correct.
The tactics over the past few years have been to label speech with which people disagree as "hate speech." There is undoubtedly still plenty of actual hate speech out there, but we're talking about people who were once far to the left, who are now not left enough... being called complicit in the patriarchy or whatever the ingroup/outgroup du jour is they're railing against.. Bari Weiss wrote an interesting opinion piece about the "Intellectual Dark Web" awhile back that touched on some of this, and though I'm not certain what Kanye is really up to, he's definitely challenging the perception of what is expected of his "identity." It's a small amount of people who are the loudest and most oppressive, but they seem to continue growing their numbers... which is dangerous.
Noam is onr of those people i usually disagree with but def respect... and on fundamental issues he's often correct.
I'm curious as to where in the pantheon of public discourse you find anyone who thinks debate is actually tolerated though, no matter how limited the spectrum. It seems to me that even within r/libertarian you find "Fuck off, comrade! You're not libertarian enough! "
Well what’s called libertarian in the United States, which is a special U. S. phenomenon, it doesn’t really exist anywhere else — a little bit in England — permits a very high level of authority and domination but in the hands of private power: so private power should be unleashed to do whatever it likes. The assumption is that by some kind of magic, concentrated private power will lead to a more free and just society.
Yes, and so well that kind of libertarianism, in my view, in the current world, is just a call for some of the worst kinds of tyranny, namely unaccountable private tyranny. Anarchism is quite different from that. It calls for an elimination to tyranny, all kinds of tyranny. Including the kind of tyranny that’s internal to private power concentrations. So why should we prefer it? Well I think because freedom is better than subordination. It’s better to be free than to be a slave. It's better to be able to make your own decisions than to have someone else make decisions and force you to observe them. I mean, I don’t think you really need an argument for that. It seems like … transparent.
by Noam Chomsky
Very rarely are you prohibited by the (US) government from saying what you want. Even when they did limit it, it was more towards shutting left wing socialist/communists down.
The reality is right wing/Libertarian speakers have always been able to speak, it's just nobody wants to hear them.
When I read this comment my thought is, the public (people not government) established the box, and they aren't interested in the inane ramblings of ancapism. Or the drumbeat of minarchist. That's the people saying shut up, which violates no Libertarian philosophy I know of.
Leon Trotsky and Woodrow Wilson would like to know your location
It’s not really a right, it’s a privilege bestowed upon us by the ruling government. There is no inherent human rights, just privileges. Who ever is in control grants the privileges they choose.
There's also the process of moving the goal posts. If you want, say, People with Stripes to not come into the country, you can get some wayyy overzealous people saying."Striped People should be shot!" Then the debate becomes whether or not Striped People should be shot or not and a reasonable sounding middle ground is just to keep them out of the country.
Can someone please explain this quote?
The left wants to control your speech
The only thing above criticism is corruption.
A socialist, libertarians and Christian fundamentalists walk into a bar.
Noam thinks y'all are with the spectrum of acceptable debate... and that libertarians are idiots. smart dude.
Mmm a cartoonish poster who memes about the left is posting a leftist's words.
Chomsky is a Socialist and a Genocide Apologist.
Quoting a communist about free speech..
I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:
If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)
High IQ moron NPChomsky is correct every now and again
Chomsky was also pro allowing fascist groups to speak and I agree with him.
Made with Love in New York City, New Jersey & Monterrey, Mexico.