Reminder that /r/LibertarianMeme is a subreddit that exists exclusively for memes.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
Preach it. There isn’t a single politician we can trust. There is no interest in the citizens well being. There is only agendas.
It's pro-democracy workers vs anti-democracy monopolists which want to acquire unearned income without working.
Expand More Comments
Yeah... but there are a lot of rich white straight men running the state... BUT the state does keep a lot of poor black gay women on welfare to guarantee their votes.
“Not white vs black” Then why do they hate us?
It's rich vs. poor. Always has been.
In capitalism, the rich control the state.
Read some Marx to learn more.
I don’t think anybody thought it was gonna die. Although my internet has gotten significantly slower.
So then why not just keep it on the books to prevent it from happening?
7 out of 9 unsourced statistics on Reddit are made up
I hope more states have passed their own net-neutrality laws, if the feds don’t.
This is sometimes where the libertarian flaw of less government hurts us. In a perfect competitive market this law wouldn't be needed, but since Utilities are gov't created monopolies or oligopolies in most places we sadly need laws to protect the citizens from corporate raping.
Seems like a post hoc fallacy.
So we're expected to believe that the NN repeal caused near monopolistic companies to all of a sudden spur investment and improve their networks? When they've been known to throttle and prioritize traffic to benefit their own services over their competitors before? When they've conspired to not compete for customers in many areas, so it appears like there's a choice of ISPs when there really isn't? Isn't it more likely that they could easily shape and prioritize speedtesting traffic (especially now that it's perfectly legal to do so) in order to "prove" that repealing NN was good for the consumer? What about technological advancement? How much of this improvement is driven by that? How much of it is driven by the throttling and shaping of legitimate traffic?
You can demonstrate ISP traffic shaping and prioritization at home. Get a VPN and tunnel all of your traffic. The latency and bandwidth available will stay consistent no matter what you do with it. Remove the VPN, and watch your latencies and available bandwidth change depending on what services you utilize.
Happens all the time.
Maybe one day, when they aren't lobbying against the public developing their own networks because the people have no real choice otherwise, maybe I'll believe them. But until they actually welcome competition, they can go take a hike.
Soft Net Neutrality died.
Hard Net Neutrality took the idea of Net Neutrality put it through the wood-chipped of legislation. What comes out of that process is generally so mangled and disfigured by riders and special interests stapled to it as to no longer be recognizable.
Hard Net Neutrality in name only. Net neutrality was dead since the moment Verizon sued successfully to destroy Soft Net Neutrality. Hence no change when Hard Net Neutrality was shut down. The only thing canceled were the ugly riders and special interests attached.
We need to regulate social media companies as if they were public utilities. To ensure that people’s voices are rightfully protected.
Why is a libertarian against net neutrality? Humans don't get more rights out of this. Internet providers get the ability to charge more for things you are already paying for.
Bitcoin isn't edible. Believe me, I've tried
Soooooo not to be an ass, but what's the point of this post?
Sure, and it's factored into the price of the transaction
Seriously what a great frontpage for a joke publication. Splittin' my sides over here.
I promise to defend the second amendment rights of every american, and I always will.
Not Real Activists.National Republican Apologists.Negotiating Rights Away.
Guys it’s 25829D chess that he’s letting back door ammo bans get closer and closer due to him constantly trying to ban accessories.
Trump accomplished more gun control as president than Obama did! Now when you factor in judicial nominations it's a little more hazy, but that doesn't change the fact that Trump is no friend to gun owners.
Thought this was Mad magazine at first 😂
Is this real?
The NRA and trump are the enemy’s, they are for gun control......join the GOA
Is there any way to moderate this group and get rid of shitposts like this one? Or, is there a moderated group that is an alternative?
The right for rich men to own $10,000 imported Italian shotguns with inlaid gold filigree shall not be infringed.
This is art.
Remember the Maine
"tAxEs eR tHeFt"
No step on snek
If I were President I would ensure that the right of the People to express their dissatisfaction with their corrupt and authoritarian government was protected.
Her, Charlie Kirk and all of turning point USA are ridiculous. Claim to be a new wave of conservatives but all they do is milk trumps dick
The scariest part is that she thinks the president has the power to do any of that.
As a nation, we began by declaring that 'all men are created equal.' We now practically read it 'all men are created equal, except negroes.' When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read 'all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and Catholics.' When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretense of loving liberty – to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.
Abraham Lincoln, Lincoln Letters
As much as I hate people burning the flag this seams a little extreme... I don’t think that this is a direction I want to go
North Koreans wish they could get out by burning a flag
I like Candace Owens, but this idea of criminalizing flag burning is ridiculous, especially for any freedom loving, Constitution venerating American. Just stop already.
Even Antonin Scalia supported flag burning:
This joke gets funnier every time its reposted.
Pretty damn close, but the government should be much, much fatter.
What a bitch...
So let the government have all of your money, or constantly fight them for it while they fuck you in the ass.
The party of small government my ass.
The party of fiscal responsibility everybody!
And before the republicans come in and cry "But muh democrats have the house!!" The 2019 budget was passed in 2018 under a fully republican congress.
Can you link to the source?
Is this adjusted for 2% inflation per year?
Looks like a consistent curve no matter which political party is in power.
Is there any way to control spending other than a Dem president and Republicans in at least one house of Congress?
All Rs = huge spending
All Ds = mindblowing spending
R president, Ds in Congress = huge spending
D president, Rs in Congress = reasonable spending. Rs pretend to care about government spending only when a Democrat is President.
I haven’t heard a thank you from those increased farm subsidies.
To want there to be charity is to want the existence of an underclass that grovels before the gifts from their betters.
But also more donors and recipients.
Also read his dissent in Lawrence v Texas
Didn't this dude die while on a free vacation at someone's ranch?
Isn't that charity?
OP can you even find time to chortle your daddy trumps balls in between all the boot licking?
Fuck outta here with this shit.
He wants to harden social hierarchies by forcing the poor to bootlick the rich just in order to survive
Ah one of those bootlicker trumpists who claims to be libertarian. I mean you could be a Trumpist all you want but you don’t have to be all vegan CrossFit douche about it which you all seem to be.
If your whole basis for giving is to feel happy, you may be doing it wrong, and as a legal argument this has to be a piss poor one.
Scalia voted for censorship, govt promoting religion, sex laws, creationism.... He was a pretty bad judge.
Made with Love in New York City, New Jersey & Monterrey, Mexico.