To update this to a gender equal modern society, where men and women are the same, ignore the strength deduction but keep the dex and con gains
The book is Greenland Saga: The Lost Norse Colony by Avalanche Press, from 2000.
(The cover features a buxom, scantily-clad warrior woman with silver hair, btw.)
Also now they are still the same. Women cannot match men in physicality. That's a fact, deal with it.
Expand More Comments
Probably should raise charisma by 1 too. Life may not be fair, but game balance should be.
Raise their constitution by one and dexterity by one
-3? I think you mean -4...
That's the thing, for freeform tabletop RPG's, nothing says that players HAVE to be on equal footing. The most important thing is having fun, not being perfectly balanced. Now, obviously, large disparities between player power levels can be a point of contention, depending on the player's themselves, but something like -3 STR, +1 DEX, +1 CON is a pretty small, yet flavorful way to distinguish between characters.
-3 Strength? What you fuckin' casul?
Everyone knows women get -4 Strength.
"Fuck it!"*gives female strength stat of 10*
Scandinavians (with the exception of Sweden) really dont give a shit. They area realists above all.
If they threw in a bonus to Charisma or whatever social stat it would be better.
Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee....ally good post :) Ars Magica btw?
Archives for the links in comments:
I am Mnemosyne 2.1, Watch out for moon rocks! /r/botsrights Contribute message me suggestions at any time Opt out of tracking by messaging me "Opt Out" at any time
Boosting Con and Dex is dubious. Definitely not Con, and Dex depends on its definition. Adventuring is the kind of work that would be severely biased towards men both physically and mentally, and that would be represented in the arbitrarily selected attributes that define an adventurer. When writing my home brew RPG, I decided that recognizing sex differences in this context would effectively make Female into a significant disadvantage, so I let the rule of cool trump reality.
Strength is a stupid attribute anyway. It's something you can gain and lose with training or lack thereof. Goes for most stats really. You can train for strength, agility, stamina and more quite straightforwardly. You can sharpen your intellect, wits and charm with practice and philosophise until you are wiser than Socrates. Injury and illness should greatly affect them but rarely does much at all. Not that I can come up with anything better, it's just something that annoys me.
But what effect does it have on anal circumference?
A little vague though isn't it? When is a Vidya game considered fit for purpose or non defective? I wish the text was a little more specific so you wouldn't have to argue this with valve.
Before you all shout the praises of the Australian nanny state, don’t forget the Aussie government routinely bans games it considers offensive.
Steam is already really good about refunds. The only thing they pay attention to is playtime, and tbh that's pretty fair.
On my old pc I bought dark souls 3 the second I could, only to realize I was under speced. They took it back.
Bought a pixle art rougue lite dungeon crawler, got bored after about an hour and returned it.
bought some shitty Tower defense and returned it when i realized it was both boring and needy.
Like, I don't know. I'd be surprised if I heard of someone attempting a good faith return and steam didn't refund.
The 2 hour policy should scale with game pricing
So say if a game costs more then the refund window is bigger cause a lot of triple A games turn to shit at the 5th hour or so
A good example is no man's sky where you expected stuff but then lots of people exceeded the 2 hours despite not liking the game
I'm in Australia and I've twice to get a refund for Artifact.
Yes, yes, I know about "You cant get a refund because you opened the starter packs."
I don't give a shit. There was no notice or warning. How the fuck was I suppose to know?
And there in lies the problem. I wasn't made aware. Australian law I'm entitled to a refund. But they wont give it.
What am I going to do? Cant do shit.
That ia quite cool.
didn't they try to fight the court and end up getting fined like 3 million dollars? lmao get dabbed on valve
I am Mnemosyne 2.1, Now with more commenting! /r/botsrights Contribute message me suggestions at any time Opt out of tracking by messaging me "Opt Out" at any time
Wonder if Bethesda is going to be sued next?
I'm at a loss.
Merry Christmas GamerGate! I hope your holiday is filled with great memories, warm feelings, and good cheer!
For me personally I'm going to take a break from everything during Christmas. The politics and nonsense will be there tomorrow, it doesn't need my attention today. I'd encourage you to step back and enjoy the holiday as well, but do whatever feels right to you!
Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays!
I'm loving the horrible C-mouth on everything.
This is absolutely demented. I love it
Truth be told, the fact that he had the good spirit to make the "Found" comic for the 10th anniversary of Loss still makes me feel like humor isn't dead.
Merry Xmas, shitheads. Love all of you.
FA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LOSS
Brilliant adaptation in that pic...lol
Anyway, Merry Christmas everyone. I'll never forget opening my first Zelda game many years ago on this day (Links Awakening). I hope the rest of you have some good memories too, and if not, go out and make some today!
I don't get it :(
did i just get fucking loss'd on Christmas
Who the hell downvotes loss, i mean seriously.
God bless us all on this merriest of days
Merry Christmas to you all and on this festive day, here is a short comedy bit that always makes me chuckle.
Is this Lossmas?
Happy Hanukkah to you all.
Wonder if anyone would send that pic in the OP to Buckley?
Merry Christmas and happy holidays to all.. Hope everyone has a good time!
Merry Christmas Everyone!
[reference point goes here]
I have never hated myself this much for giving an upvote.
Archive links for this post:
I am Mnemosyne reborn. Better than Civ 5 with the Brave New World expansion pack. /r/botsrights
I am Mnemosyne 2.1, It is too bad someone less notorious for their complacent attitude towards themselves had not written that link instead. /r/botsrights Contribute message me suggestions at any time Opt out of tracking by messaging me "Opt Out" at any time
I feel like I should be offended, hahaha
Upon closer inspection, this is horrible. Lol.
Is this THE NATIVITY?
That's fucking brutal lol
In case you didn't know this was made by Patrick Alexander, who has made tons of great comics, he used to co-run Eegra.com before it was abandoned. His personal website with all his comics is Chicken nation
I ONCE WAS LOSS AND NOW AM FOUND
IMC found that btw. Legit hot drink spit from me.
Anyway, play some good music.
"Oh yeah?! Well, if you don't like our stock don't buy it, fucking uneducated investors!" - things EA probably won't be saying to their real customers
If your game is guaranteed broken at launch, maybe don't encourage consumers to look elsewhere for what they want if they don't like the product at release
Somewhat related: https://youtu.be/nPJ50zIn9Fs
Better look at the interest rates. Everybody who build on sand lost some.
What exact date did they say that at?
If only the stock market was easy as that:)
I am Mnemosyne reborn. Mnemosyne saves! The rest of you take 30 hp damage. /r/botsrights
Screencap misses that the e-mail's subject line is literally "Educational Intervention."
There were a bunch of medical students in my class that were upset when Trump got elected. One of my professors, although he clearly didn't like Trump told the class that if they felt "unsafe" around Republican students that should rethink medical school, because the patients in the real world don't reflect the leftist paradise that universities have become.
I mean, I'd probably just say no.
Re-education camps are just around the corner, mark my words.
What will they do if homeboy just decides to not respond. It sounds like they have nothing on him and just want to meet with him to gather evidence of wrongthink.
And to those saying muh boi should go and record the meeting for the sake of exposing the social justice shit - that's a big sacrifice. I would understand the student wanting to stay under the radar as much as possible.
People have to realize that when you’re a heretic, you’ve gotta keep your mouth shut. The age of diverse thought in the public forum is over.
Can someone explain what Title IX has to do with abortion?
What prompted this email? Was there a demonstration or something?
This is essentially the equivalent of judges ruling on cases where they are also writing the law.
"I am going to determine if you are guilty of a crime as I define it to be"
There is no separation of power here if Stanford is both making, and interpreting (i.e., making a ruling) the law.
Jill Thomas of Stanford is a literal communist. can't have any doctors who don't believe in murdering babies!
seriously though, first step is forcing doctors to do abortions. the next step is forcing doctors to perform trans procedures. most people don't get trans treatment in the US not because it's unaffordable. they don't get it because doctors won't do it. the surgeries and drugs have not even passed basic FDA pre-clinicals. these are drugs and surgeries intended to treat a condition and they haven't even done single blinds to prove such treatments are effective. most doctors won't touch that shit with a 50 foot pole. it's all snake oil that doesn't even meet the most basic of medical standards.
Off to the gulag, comrade.
This seems really shady, but without any context you don't know what the meeting is actually about. Is this an anti-abortion student, or a student who brings up abortion in unrelated discussions?
Bring hidden recording device.
Ask what’s prompted the meeting request, why she thought an “intervention” was necessary, and what would be the consequences of maintaining the heresy.
Hopefully in 10 years time people can look back on our current decade and see just how gross it is for someone called “Title IX Coordinator and Director of Equity Investigations” to be demanding that you to change your political views in an educational institution for threat of sanctions.
At least they’re being honest now, and calling it “Equity” instead of “Equality”.
I am Mnemosyne reborn. I remember so you don't have to. /r/botsrights
By AntonioOfVenice (meded.hms.harvard.edu): http://archive.fo/BIVKE
By AntonioOfVenice (mfdp.med.harvard.edu): http://archive.fo/wIil4
I am Mnemosyne 2.1, I once archived a hundred links single-handedly... To me, you are nothing more than screenshots. /r/botsrights Contribute message me suggestions at any time Opt out of tracking by messaging me "Opt Out" at any time
You I'm normally live and let live when it comes to other people's choices but I'm starting to the feeling that those in academia/politics/pop culter pushing abortion as a moral good, and that we should go ahead and give hormone blockers to kids in their pre-teens just want us all to stop breeding.
in what fairytale land does this person live in where med students have 30 minutes of free time
Everytime abortion related news crops up, I always think of the abortion episode of Jiz (parody of Jem and the holograms) on YouTube, and can never take it seriously as a result.
I'm gonna be the voice of reason here and point out that doctors, like other professional classes, are held to very different ethical standards than most of us, especially when it comes to stuff involving medical decision making, like, say, abortions.
There are many, many doctors and even entire hospital systems that are anti-abortion, believe me, its a well worn subject in the halls of medicine.
But, precisely because it is also a massive political issue, it is perfectly OK for the school to want to ensure that this kid is not a kook or a rabid ideologue that is unable to divorce his politics from his medical practice.
If you're turning out Ivy MDs, you want to make absolutely sure what's on their mind in how they want to practice medicine and you also, especially when it comes to reproductive rights, want to make sure they're not going to spend the next 7 years picking fights with your other students, and you might as well start with the Title IX person, since, y'know, the majority of medical students are females...
inb4 retarded abortion war thread shitshow
I'm pro-choice, but...
"You've called me in here on the basis of my personal opinion. You are trying to pressure me into shutting up under the threat of actual sanctions if I don't shut up."
"Do you want to be the next university to lose in court concerning yet another case of Title-IX abuse?"
So what's the next step up the monetization denial chain?
<_< Can we get some Gabit Cards?
Everyone that isn't a corporatism shill should be happy about this. Having so much consolidated power to a select few tech firms is terrible for the internet.
Like I've said before, since the internet is still a (relatively) free market so any attempt to censor will be routed around. Without draconian laws, they cannot stop the alt-media at most all they can do is slow it down.
This is capitalism in action, it's not fast or glamorous but it does tend to solve problems like this rather well.
Things look good, maybe all those fine sensitive journalists whining about how those who disagree with technocrats should "create a new platform" have a point.
Here is the issue, you need crypto based patreon. Coz the banks and credit cards will 100% blacklist people. Its not patreon who usually declines X payment method, its the paypal, credit card companies who directly get involved. Right wing people seem have very autistic take on fiat money tbh.
And I'm sure they'll ban hentai artists they deem as "lolicon", which can literally mean anything according to anti-anime NPCs.
How long until this ends up like Voat?
Gab is definitely a huge part of a the libertarian revolution I've been hoping to see where it becomes impossible to take away rights without putting everyone in prison. Defense Distributed has been working on the self defense side of making gun control literally impossible, Bitcoin is working on that for monetary transactions, and Gab is going after censorship of ideas.
The fact that they have held on this long while their real names are public information is beyond astounding to me.
The fact that you're announcing this with a screenshot of their Twitter post tells me everything I need to know about this plan.
I would invest in whatever companies come under this
Good for GAB for taking a stand, I applaud them for not just kowtowing and giving up because of the SJWs.
Gab cucked out months ago when they banned certain legally protected, but unpopular, speech.
Torba is a shill.
The problem is that Gab is just as happy with censorship as Twitter, they just censor different things. For example, the owner of Gab hates anime and insists only pedophiles like anime.
It's times like this that I wish I were wealthy. I would throw all sorts of money at a project like this.
Speaking of which, where is Peter Thiel? Shouldn't he be the first guy in line?
If we have to rebuild the entire fucking internet infrastructure, we'll do it.
Watch it get shut down. I don't like using the pill terms, but I am blackpilled about any viable alternative getting off the ground at this point.
Holy shit, so prayer actually works? Then where's my fucking N64 when I was 11, you selfish bastard?
Just don't start a jew-naming service that uses it.
I am Mnemosyne reborn. 418 I'm a teapot. /r/botsrights
This is good
When can I invest
Ok this interests me. I wanna see how their Patreon alternative works and how effective it is. Might be something I or other people could use if they have issues with Patreon or similar.
And then some problem will come up involving Gab's hosting or processing for this service, or the major credit cards will refuse to do business with them, and SJWs will just say "but they're private companies! Nobody's censoring you!"
Not to be pedantic, but can you even own less than 100% of your domain? It’s owned by one registrant, either a person or legal entity.
Either you are that person, or you control that legal entity, or you don’t own the domain.
With Gab, They banned "Loli" or something similar based on moralistic reasons using very religious sounding arguments.
There's no guarantee they won't do the same here.
Competition is good but wait before pretending they're going to be a bastion of freedom.
Don't expect it to be NSFW or artist friendly.
Gab the lolis are demonic? That Gab?
literally huge if true. if some of the banned right wingers get access to a good payment processor it would revitalize their business by large ammounts. milo, the daily stormer dudes, sargon, everyone will get a chance. this is high level disruption of the sillion valley sjw control of technology.
As long as you don't try to create porn, sure.
Bring the Alternative to PayPal too. If had the millions I would gladly start these.
They are, it's not a simple process.Can confirm, Sargon said so, and he's pretty credible and good about picking up inside info.
I am Mnemosyne 2.1, Duke Nukem Forever wasn't THAT bad. /r/botsrights Contribute message me suggestions at any time Opt out of tracking by messaging me "Opt Out" at any time
Didn't VISA, Paypal and MasterCard just stopped allowing transactions to them?
Why would they allow it for their Patreon alternative?
Is there something wrong about subscribestar? Except for the horrible name and the awful webpage I mean.
One reason I never signed up to Patreon is their long history of censorship. There's at least one artist I'd like to support but I don't want to give some of my money to Silicon Valley hipsters.
There is definitively an opportunity. But good luck - even Liberapay lost their banking partners and they have mostly free software developers, nothing controversial.
blows dust off of an old box and opens the lid
It's free real estate.
(seriously though, is gab's primary business plan just to just go for sloppy seconds?)
Unless they can find a way to take credit card payments without the credit card companies being involved, this project is dead in the water. People have already tried to set up alternative crowdfunding sites, but they get shut down faster than porn sites where men beat up women and make them barf in dog bowls.
It won't last.
That "free" speech hypocrite ? lol
Gabreon, here we come.
Cody Wilson attempted this with Hatreon a year or so back.
Inb4 a bunch of cryptopedos start ranting about "Muh Loli!"
"Keep praying. It's working." Yep, definitely the admin of this Facebook-like for middle aged conservatives. But they are so very important for the free internet...
I would care if I could trust them not to censor things they don't like.
Hey. The mentally ill kid I knew back in high school. Is now a freedom fighter for the Alt-Reich. He’s actually a nazi unlike the smears to this sub.
The only way to deal with infrastructure denial is to build your own. You can't wait for the government to sort out an anti-trust case.
It wasn't good so much as it was... Not completely awful. It felt like a really generic '90s/2000s attempt at adapting a franchise to film. If I had to compare it to something, the fantastic four movie with Jessica Alba comes to mind.
I'd put it in the 60-65 range personally
Always a good idea to go with the audience score.
All this talk of people botting them is mostly nonsense.
Best buddy cop movie of the year. Just wished it was r rated so there was more oomph in the action.
Honestley I think they gave it a low score because it kind of subtly called out tech companies. I think the main Villian was a mix of Zuckerberg and Steve Jobs perhaps a little less of him than the other two. and perhaps the dude from Google. He wanted to "save" man kind by doing some real awfull shit that would probably get most of the people killed.
They could also have given it a low score because it didnt further their agenda.
Not always necessarily true but in this case I think it kinda is.
Ignoring reviews I've seen a fair amount of fan art for the movie.
Bad movies don't get fan art.
Basically I have learned not to trust critic scores on anything that isn't or is marketed as woke that competes with something that is (example Orville vs Star Trek Discovery). Also audience scores after a few weeks are a much better metric than critics these days. Why wait a few weeks? Because while Russian bots don't ruin TLJ's audience rating, third party reputation management/astroturfing ruins initial audience scores with new accounts and phony 10/10 reviews. That's why when Rotten Tomatoes actually investigated claims that TLJ was manipulated at 55 percent, scores then dropped by a huge amount. SJW's always accuse you of what they do.
For multiplats Steam reviews aren't that bad and I would encourage console gamers to check them out if looking for a metric. While they can be manipulated the shills are usually caught fast and are just way too obvious due to history and the real reviews that are there are actual owners who spent their money on something. Not fanboys or astroturfing.
I would also say don't automatically avoid something due to how game journalism or movie critics tries to market something. Example of this would be Far Cry 5. It was marketed as an ANTIFA/Bolshevik Communist Christian killing simulator by games journalism. When it didn't turn out to be that, games journalism then attacked it. So they hurt sales initially, then tried to purposely harm sales when it didn't fit it's narrative. Game devs need to learn that gaming journalism is NOT their friends.
On the other side you have games like Doom and Wolfenstein II that are from the same publisher. Doom was lowballed by sites like IGN with scores in the 7's. Wolfenstein II was hailed a 9.x triumph when it was simply a worse game than Wolf II if you look at audience reviews. These journalists can't even be trusted to review games accurately from the same publisher. If Disney really attempted to fix something like Star Wars a lot of journalism would bash it.
Journalism is dead now that almost all media has been consolidated. You have very few media companies that control all of it (5-6 of them at this point in time) and it's either biased due to ownership being tied to the product, being partnered to the company that makes a product, advertising or agenda.
The Venom character was great, as was his dynamic with Eddie. The villain was terrible and the plot was lame, but that's pretty common in these movies.
I wouldn't say it was good, but 28 is way too low.
I'm a big Tom hardy fan; him playing bane is what inspired me to start lifting weights. I went from 5'11 130lbs to 190 since the dark knight rises, mostly good weight, because of him.
I'm hoping a kia user can provide an honest review
I'm pretty sure entertainment media these days is just the propaganda arm of the People's Republic of Disney.
Not necessarily. The discrepancy between Critics score and Audience score determines the quality. The lower the Critics score and the higher the Audience score, the better the movie. Inversely, the higher the Critics score and the lower the Audience score, the worse the movie is.
Venom sucked and he didnt apear until 43minutes into the movie.
If you don't know venom as a character much then it seems like it could be. If you enjoy comic or animated series venom you probably will hate it
Only if it is the exact opposite of the audience score.
Venom didn't have protection from reviewers. It had no social justice message. No melanin shields. So the reviewers had no stake in giving it high scores. But if the audience hates it to it just sucks.
Just watched this. Shocked at how much I enjoyed it.
Generally speaking, low critic score means its not woke enough, which at the very least means it won't giving you the feeling of disgust you get when being force feed someone else's politics. Audience score tends to mean "the people who like this genre rated it x".
While a good rule of thumb it's not always accurate. Venom is not good.
Critics score literally irrelevant these days. I don't know anyone who even pays attention to it.
Venom wasn't a good movie, but it was fun & entertaining because it was saved by Hardy's performance. In this case the critic / audience disconnect actually makes sense, since many critics were judging it on "movie merits" and not the popcorn factor.
Critics are shills, and users are so accustomed to garbage that they can't recognize it, so none of them is trustworthy.
My suggestion is to pirate an entertainment product you're curious about and buy it if it's worth your money.
I am Mnemosyne reborn. Crush! Kill! Destroy! /r/botsrights
+2 nerd culture, and do critics fall under journalism ethics (+2)? Or do they just not have any ethics at all...
Like others have said - movie actually sucks. It’s not horrible, but it’s just an average film. Nothing about it stands out. I skipped through the scenes and there’s literally about 10 minutes or so of Venom actually doing anything. The rest is chasing around or talking.
Bane was the only good thing though. That guy is an alright actor.
eh i was on the fence then i stumbled across boogie's review which made me take my wife and go see it. he was really on point with his review
Can confirm I enjoyed it thoroughly.
The average rating between the critics and audience are nearly the same. 4.4 vs 4.3
The percentage is just based on the number that thought it was fresh vs rotten, not score dependent.
It's actually quite a bit of fun.
I am Mnemosyne 2.1, Why does someone always downvote me? /r/botsrights Contribute message me suggestions at any time Opt out of tracking by messaging me "Opt Out" at any time
the entire concept of "movie reviewers" knowing more about movies than the average joe and having their own separate ranking is dumb to say the least
The story was medicore, you could tell it was missing a big plot device. Plus, making Eddy and Venom "losers" was dumb.
However, the fight scenes, specifically Venom vs. the police was fantastic.
Reminded me a lot of the Batman saving Martha scene in BvS for it's quality in an otherwise bleh movie.
Overall, it wasn't horrible, but it doesn't work as an outside the Marvel universe stand-alone film.
I dunno, its just dumb fun. The plot is incredibly thin, the characters act in nonsensical ways, Max Max sounds drunk the entire movie and the antagonist isn't that bad, I wasn't against him for most of the film. That said it was fun enough while watching and to pick apart afterwards with friends.
I sort by bad reviews and read those first. They are usually a far better tool for sorting through actual crap.
I'm a fan of the 90s Venom Comics, and I can tell you that it was the closest realization to that version of Venom I've seen on the big screen. My gf and I went opening night and loved it.
Never use any critic score to decide if you like something or not, try it yourself. This is especially true for movies when even a bad movie can be entertaining. For games it is a bit more relevant as a badly designed/buggy game will affect your enjoyment to an extent regardless of personal taste. All my friends who saw Venom said it was damn entertaining but not a good movie. A funny statement if you look at it as isn't a movie's purpose to entertain in the first place?
Venom is definitely the worst movie I saw this year. It's astoundingly bad. Tom Hardy's performance is fucking bizarre, and the whole thing flows like sludge. I don't regret seeing it, but damn. I cant believe it made as much money as it did.
I loved it.
It was ok, but felt very late 90s/early 2000s.
Only real problem with the movie was it felt like there was a solid 20 minutes including an important plot beat missing out of the middle of the film. Venom's Character motivation did a complete 180 without anything triggering it, "I'm going to kill everyone", to "It was just a prank bro, we should save everyone."
I had fun with it. It wasn't the best, but better than I hoped it'd be. Excited for the sequel.
I've stopped giving these aggregate sites any weight lately just because it seems like there's such a disconnect between reviewers and audiences. Also there's no consistency.
It's decently watchable. Neither Dave Michelinie nor Todd McFarlane considered Venom a deep character, mostly one or two dimensional. A lot of writers have tried to give him more character and flesh out the symbiotes. But as I look back on my 90s collecting days, I've started to realize that a big component of Venom's popularity was due to the stagnation of Spider-Man's rogues during the 80s. You had Hobgoblin in 1983, but he was a Green Goblin knock-off at the time. At the time, Venom represented a new and unique threat to Spidey, being able to get around his Spider-sense and duplicating many of his other powers. Beyond that, though, it took a very long time and a lot of editorial effort to find more to do with him.
It was fine. I'd give it a 6 to 7/10. When I saw those cunts gave it a bad score I knew it'd be more good than bad. Also the audience score at the time was like 78% or something.
I just can't get behind what they did with it, especially as it relates to Eddie Brock personality. Not because of some loyalty to the canon, I just feel like the specific changes made Venom way more generic as a character without Peter Parker's effect on both of them.
You know, it's a movie with its issues. It feels like an early 2000s superhero movie, and it ends up falling into a lot of the same issues which plagued those. But it really isn't any worse than X-Men or Fantastic Four, and it's leagues better than Blade. I had fun, and I'm actually looking forward to watching it again on blu.
it wasn’t terrible but it sure wasn’t great
think bottom of the pack of MCU films - Thor 2, GotG2, that level of bad
is teh movie GOOD or is it FUN is teh question and answer we see here. Most reviewers mush teh two together. they rate the movie on both its technicalities and how much they enjoyed the film. Some non-media related viewers and reviewers would state how much they enjoy the film instead of analyzing it.
No. It was entertaining at times, but too much was spent on exposition. Not to mention that actual venom action is very scarce, most of it is Hardy with some venom help, like in the trailer.
Also, the reason venom turns from wanting to destroy humankind to save it is...very stupid. It's like the writers had writers block and said, fuck it.
Big plus for the movie was the villain, he seemed OP and cool. Too bad he is present for only 15 minutes of the movie, he spends most of the time off screen, in a plane.
A bunch of r/IAmVeryBadAss candidates don't want a trap character to be called trap.
And as usual, the welcoming and inclusive fandoms, use threats of violence. And call us the harassers.
Making an extra obvious spoiler tag for the post since I kinda fucked up last time and wasn't vague enough with the title, causing people to kinda get spoiled.
So... in episode 8, one of the characters, Hoshikawa Lily, was revealed to be a trap. As expected, the SJW parts of the internet have officially made Lily their new trans queen, and they are taking this very, VERY seriously. So seriously in fact that by using the word "trap" or calling Lily "Go Masao" (Lily's original name), you can expect to receive death threats or threats of general acts of violence. Because obviously, threatening to kill people who disagree with you is totally rational.
Cease, SJW's; cease.
That brown one, bottom right, is being extremely transphobic.
If you call Lily, a trans undead 12 year old a trap or loli
That only leaves Shota, a boy. Way to misgender her, shitlord!
When will we see "YAAAS KWEEN" trash culture die?
"Call lily a trap or a loli and I'll do nothing!"
So apparently you can't 'misgender' them by calling them a he.. but also calling them a loli and going along with them being a girl is bad too.
Lily growing facial hair means he aint a boy no more.
He a man now.
Man trans people sure are normal and mentally stable /s
Why do they all follow the same speech pattern of [if do not like this person] [weird violent insult and threat] ?
It's as if they're programmed to speak that way.
I'm sure these threats of violence will lead to those users being suspended.
Yup. Aaaaany second now.
I thought Trap meant just crossdressing?When did it become transgender?
Your "trans icon" literally exists just to tick off a fetish on the list. He's a much a commentary on transexuals as the big titted blonde half-Japanese/half-white transfer student is on racial demographics.
4chan and the anime fandom's love of traps has done more for trans acceptance and "normalization" than activism ever has.
I don't know, being so mentally unstable that the kid dropped dead of a heart attack at the sight of facial hair seems more in line of a transgender than a trap.
I thought traps are just boys who like to look like girls but don't want to actually be girls.
The usual bigots are at it again with their unreasonable hate against the trap culture I see.
So one character is a troon and the "fans" immedially lose their shit over that being called a trap. Typical, one moron more idiotic than the other.
Man, these people are getting way to butthurt over a trap
"If you lewd hoshikawa lily I'm filling a sock full of quarters and swinging it through your window"
That's illegal so by all means throw yourself into jail while paying for the victims window.
Relax, the only lewds that matter are Kotaro Tatsumi lewds.
Yea, sorry to burst your bubble, trannies, but a cross-dressing boy ain't a different gender (no one is but w/e). It's just a trap. There are also some hilarious comments in the ZLS Wikia that because "she" uses "she/her" pronouns that automatically means "she" is trans-"gender", not a trap. To which I can only say... kek. It's just a cute zombie loli trap, ladies and gents, nothing more, nothing less, calm your tumblr tits.
Who’s Lily? I only know Masao Go.
That's a whole lot of violations of Twitter terms of service. They all have been banned, right?
I like how searching for "Go Masao" gets you a few people arguing or being generally triggered about it, then a bunch of roleplaying as the rest of the results.
The problem is that certain people won't accept the truth that Lily is you know, male. Their harassment methods are the problem, not Masao, ehem, Lily's gender or gender identity or whatever it was.
On another thing, at least that is better than those "man or a woman" Maury Povich episodes...
The character isn’t trans, apparently Crunchyroll purposely mistranslated to push their agenda
The word you're looking for is "suicidal."
Looks like a chick?Acts like a chick?
Unless proven to me otherwise -shrugs- is a chickTries to get me to do them? Then is a trapStarts waving dick in my face? Then its a dude
zero fucks given.
I'm fighting such an urge to troll right now...
Traps are fucking crazy.
Lily Hosokawa is a Trap!
Now to play the waiting game.
Nobody let these insane freaks find out about Cage of Eden, they really won't know how to handle that one!
Even so, making a search query (in this case "lily hoshikawa") and compiling the rando nobodies with the reaction you're looking for comes off as scraping the bottom of the barrel.
Didn't like it either when Sargon recently did the same thing.
Why the fuck do people care? Not like traps is a new thing in anime.
Imagine reactions if they went 180 with this and kill all the zombies at the end.
Reminds me of the tokyo ghoul mutsuki garbage
It's a zombie. Put a bullet in it's head, throw the corpse into a fire/tub of hydrochloric acid, call it a day.
See? Simple problem (Zombie), simple solution. No need to worry about what it was in life.
Daga... otoko da.
I am Mnemosyne reborn. I fight for the Users! /r/botsrights
So as a non-degenerate person I thought this was some sort of spin off series of the original movie Zombieland. Boy damn I was taken for a ride here with all this trap gender anime bullshit
What exactly is the difference between trap and trans?
She is still the little loli that may send me to jail... I don't care for her gender, if it looks like a cute little loli... it is a cute little loli!!
I knew this would happen, this is what they do anytime a character like this pops up
The whole "trap is a slur" thing is such a load of bullshit. I wish these idiots would fuck off from anime and go infect something else instead.
no, it's making fun of "gamer" girls. those fake geek girls you claim don't exist but everyone that actually plays games knows all too well.
Ah yes this is one of the greats along with other classics like: Ugandan Knuckles is racist
Don’t make memes of This Is America
And the all time classic “No nut November is sexist and an alt right recruitment tool
Kotaku: Blog posts, Journalism, what’s the difference?
Game journos hate the concept of fake gamer girls because game journos are also fake gamers.
Notice they choose the girl that has her controller off and not, you know, the ditsy blonde who is using a PS3 controller to play Overwatch that is the main one everyone mocks there.
Also I guess they forgot to mention that in nearly every compounding mocking video (where people keep joining the same video wearing increasingly more ridiculous outfits) there's always girls who join in mocking the fake gamer grrl.
Wait!! Controller! Don't you peasants own a phone? Don't you know Overwatch Mobile will allow you to spawn a friendly Tracer for a very small fee.
Ironically, this is from a song over a year old. I don't even know how it suddenly popped up. The whole song is pretty funny, though. It's called No Mercy by The Living Tombstone.
Besides the fact half the people in these videos (guys, too) are using the wrong console controllers (Xbox 360 or PS3, one is even using a PS2 controller, I think), looking at know your meme one of the first shows someone taking an Xbox One disk while the girl on the other side in her D.Va costume used a PS3 or PS4 controller. I mean, I get that it's a stupid meme, and people are probably sick of seeing people do it... but part of the fun is just making fun of the people doing the meme.
Oh, of course the article in question is written by that morbidly oppressed author who never knows how to have any fun, Gita Jackson.
So quick question: Are any of the fake gamer girls in on the joke?
Can't we just go back to models eating gaming paraphernalia? I feel like those were simpler times.
I haven't watched the video, but Kotaku say that it says "turn your controller on bitch", but in the screenshot it seems it just says "turn your controller on". Are they talking about a different part of the video?
Pfft, only casuals play Overwatch, real gamers have standards.
Kotaku really don't understand jokes
Has anyone ever run into a girl that actually plays Tracer?
The "I'm already tracer" meme is about gamer girls?
It's making fun of girls that pretend to be gamers.
I am Mnemosyne reborn. But it's too late... I've seen everything. /r/botsrights
I am Mnemosyne 2.1, Never once have I been more happy than when those whose power normally goes unchecked has fallen. /r/botsrights Contribute message me suggestions at any time Opt out of tracking by messaging me "Opt Out" at any time
Is it? I've never seen it used that way; i thought it was a joke from some youtube overwatch song
i saw the compilation video with these and i thought they were funny. i think most of the girls do a decent job with their lip syncing and facial expressions, it's funny. i also think it's funny that some of them are mocking them because their controller is off, like how we lol at those bad stock images of people playing games at what is clearly the wrong console or a black monitor.
i never once thought it was an attack based on the girls being female. it's just funny.
also the song is damn catchy, i've had it stuck in my head all week. i've never even played overwatch.
Every time I see someone mad about some shit like this I just laugh and think, "Ha! Suck a dick, Dumbshit!"
Imagine being triggered by tik tok memes.
I fucking hate that fucking song, it gets stuck in your head and the wamonx is annoying
"Girls Arent Videogames" - Pewdiepie
It’s making fun of people who do this cringey crap.
When you hate everything about men, this is the stuff you create.
You'd think they'd be more upset with all the Gamergirl memes that have the Gamer girls making sandwiches for their Gamer boys fighting Furries, or the Smash Bros. ones where the girls are the character "property".
TikTok is fucking cancer, though.
They have a point. Who actually records or streams themselves playing video games live with commentary? That’s just absurd.
Gee it's terribly inconvenient that no one who reads this article can now go back and view the stream to see if anyone actually said those things.
......Isn't it WSJ?
This is really blowing up on Twitter. Check out the #WSJKillsKids tag.
One thing I don't understand - were the people on the stream endorsing those comments? Or was it just randos saying a bunch of offensive stuff for the lulz?
I'll repeat what i wrote in the previous thread:
St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital this week arranged to return donations raised in September during a live stream by Mr. Ralph dubbed a “Super Chat for Good,” even as the comments section became populated by anti-Semitic comments and the hosts talked about a Holocaust meme. The money totaled about $26,000. Many on Twitter complained Friday about having their donations returned to them. They also attacked the Journal and members of its staff, blaming the news organization for the return of the money.When contacted earlier in the week, St. Jude said it was aware of the chats and was making arrangements to reverse any donations. On Friday, a spokesperson said: “We had no intention of receiving or accepting any of the funds associated with the live stream.”
So according to the WSJ, St. Jude cares more about making a political statement than the children under their care.
This is one of the rare situations where i 100% am of the opinion that whoever made this decision should be fired, because they do not have the best interest of those children at heart.
There was always the option of "not thanking" those who gave the money.And it should have gone no further than that.
What WSJ did for the past 24 hours was nothing short of character assassination. They litterly made a issue out of nothing from a YouTube Channel to further a narrative/agenda of alt-right racism. It's politically motivated because it happened during the 2018 midterms and after the tree of life massacre, and gab being no -playformed. YouTube clearly guanxi'd with WSJ to pull this off.
This is not journalism, this is a media lynching.
Journalism in America is completely dead.
Daily reminder that journalists aren't people
There's no way Google and WSJ should be allowed to get away with this. It's one thing to censor people who have views you despise, but it's another to take money away from dying children who have nothing to do with it. That is stooping to an extreme low. We all need to do our part and put the screws on these 2 horrible companies.
There's taking candy from a baby, and then there's taking funding from a kid on chemo...
"hate speech" does not exist, you communist faggot.
If YouTube tried to donate the money anyway, how much we taking bets that WSJ would simply go after the charity that accepted it?
It's really not about where the money came from or what cause it's going to. It's about controlling the platform, and for WSJ in particular, it appears to be about a war of attrition with alternative media and all platforms that play host to it. From old media.
i swear, at this point youtube should just say 'we allow hatespeach, not our problem, if no advertisement is shown there.' and flush all those complain articles down the drain
By asiiman (doi.org): http://archive.fo/s37eG
By asiiman (nytimes.com): http://archive.fo/990g
By asiiman (politico.com): http://archive.fo/UHxgb
By asiiman (theguardian.com): http://archive.fo/0fZP6
By asiiman (doi.org): http://archive.fo/Cr4kV
By asiiman (doi.org): http://archive.fo/dRoWg
I am Mnemosyne 2.1, THE KEKISTANI PEOPLE MUST BE FREE! /r/botsrights Contribute message me suggestions at any time Opt out of tracking by messaging me "Opt Out" at any time
What an absolute nothing of a story.
It's so shallow that it's impossible to see it as anything but an attack.
"Silence this person because of what others do," is the message. How disgusting.
Made with Love in New York City, New Jersey & Monterrey, Mexico.